Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning to Sail Dynamic Networks: The MARLIN Reinforcement Learning Framework for Congestion Control in Tactical Environments (2306.15591v1)

Published 27 Jun 2023 in cs.LG, cs.NI, and cs.SE

Abstract: Conventional Congestion Control (CC) algorithms,such as TCP Cubic, struggle in tactical environments as they misinterpret packet loss and fluctuating network performance as congestion symptoms. Recent efforts, including our own MARLIN, have explored the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for CC, but they often fall short of generalization, particularly in competitive, unstable, and unforeseen scenarios. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an RL framework that leverages an accurate and parallelizable emulation environment to reenact the conditions of a tactical network. We also introduce refined RL formulation and performance evaluation methods tailored for agents operating in such intricate scenarios. We evaluate our RL learning framework by training a MARLIN agent in conditions replicating a bottleneck link transition between a Satellite Communication (SATCOM) and an UHF Wide Band (UHF) radio link. Finally, we compared its performance in file transfer tasks against Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Cubic and the default strategy implemented in the Mockets tactical communication middleware. The results demonstrate that the MARLIN RL agent outperforms both TCP and Mockets under different perspectives and highlight the effectiveness of specialized RL solutions in optimizing CC for tactical network environments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. V. Sivakumar, O. Delalleau, T. Rocktäschel, A. H. Miller, H. Küttler, N. Nardelli, M. Rabbat, J. Pineau, and S. Riedel, “Mvfst-rl: An asynchronous rl framework for congestion control with delayed actions,” 10 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04054
  2. Z. Xu, J. Tang, C. Yin, Y. Wang, and G. Xue, “Experience-driven congestion control: When multi-path tcp meets deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1325–1336, 2019.
  3. R. Galliera, A. Morelli, R. Fronteddu, and N. Suri, “Marlin: Soft actor-critic based reinforcement learning for congestion control in real networks,” in NOMS 2023-2023 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2023, pp. 1–10.
  4. S. Ha, I. Rhee, and L. Xu, “Cubic: A new tcp-friendly high-speed tcp variant,” SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., vol. 42, no. 5, p. 64–74, jul 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1400097.1400105
  5. E. Benvegnù, N. Suri, M. Tortonesi, and T. Esterrich, “Seamless network migration using the mockets communications middleware,” in 2010 - MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, 2010, pp. 2298–2303.
  6. A. Morelli, M. Provosty, R. Fronteddu, and N. Suri, “Performance evaluation of transport protocols in tactical network environments,” in MILCOM 2019 - 2019 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), 2019, pp. 30–36.
  7. N. Suri, A. Hansson, J. Nilsson, P. Lubkowski, K. Marcus, M. Hauge, K. Lee, B. Buchin, L. Mısırhoğlu, and M. Peuhkuri, “A realistic military scenario and emulation environment for experimenting with tactical communications and heterogeneous networks,” in 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), 2016, pp. 1–8.
  8. M. Peuster, H. Karl, and S. van Rossem, “Medicine: Rapid prototyping of production-ready network services in multi-pop environments,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), Nov 2016, pp. 148–153.
  9. N. R. L. N. P. E. A. N. P. R. Group, “Multi-generator (mgen) network test tool,” https://www.nrl.navy.mil/Our-Work/Areas-of-Research/Information-Technology/NCS/MGEN/, 2021.
  10. L. S. Brakmo, S. W. O’Malley, and L. L. Peterson, “Tcp vegas: New techniques for congestion detection and avoidance,” in SIGCOMM, 1994.
  11. N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, C. S. Gunn, S. H. Yeganeh, and V. Jacobson, “Bbr: Congestion-based congestion control,” ACM Queue, vol. 14, September-October, pp. 20 – 53, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184
  12. P. Chaudhary and S. Kumar, “Comparative study of tcp variants for congestion control in wireless network,” in 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA), 2017, pp. 641–646.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.