Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion (2306.02561v3)

Published 5 Jun 2023 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: We present LLM-Blender, an ensembling framework designed to attain consistently superior performance by leveraging the diverse strengths of multiple open-source LLMs. Our framework consists of two modules: PairRanker and GenFuser, addressing the observation that optimal LLMs for different examples can significantly vary. PairRanker employs a specialized pairwise comparison method to distinguish subtle differences between candidate outputs. It jointly encodes the input text and a pair of candidates, using cross-attention encoders to determine the superior one. Our results demonstrate that PairRanker exhibits the highest correlation with ChatGPT-based ranking. Then, GenFuser aims to merge the top-ranked candidates, generating an improved output by capitalizing on their strengths and mitigating their weaknesses. To facilitate large-scale evaluation, we introduce a benchmark dataset, MixInstruct, which is a mixture of multiple instruction datasets featuring oracle pairwise comparisons. Our LLM-Blender significantly outperform individual LLMs and baseline methods across various metrics, establishing a substantial performance gap.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. Anna Anioł and Marcin Pietroń. 2019. Ensemble approach for natural language question answering problem. 2019 Seventh International Symposium on Computing and Networking Workshops (CANDARW), pages 180–183.
  2. Pythia: A suite for analyzing large language models across training and scaling. ArXiv preprint, abs/2304.01373.
  3. Findings of the 2017 conference on machine translation (WMT17). In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, pages 169–214, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. ArXiv preprint, abs/2303.12712.
  5. Christopher J. C. Burges. 2010. From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: An overview.
  6. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference (ICML 2005), Bonn, Germany, August 7-11, 2005, volume 119 of ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 89–96. ACM.
  7. Alex Cabrera and Graham Neubig. 2023. Zeno chatbot report. Blog post.
  8. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality.
  9. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. ArXiv preprint, abs/2204.02311.
  10. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2210.11416.
  11. Free dolly: Introducing the world’s first truly open instruction-tuned llm.
  12. Persi Diaconis and Ron Graham. 1977. Spearman’s footrule as a measure of disarray. Journal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 39:262–268.
  13. GLM: General language model pretraining with autoregressive blank infilling. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 320–335, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. Alpacafarm: A simulation framework for methods that learn from human feedback. ArXiv preprint, abs/2305.14387.
  15. Koala: A dialogue model for academic research. Blog post.
  16. Debertav3: Improving deberta using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing. ArXiv preprint, abs/2111.09543.
  17. Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7-12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pages 1693–1701.
  18. Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2021. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 874–880, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  19. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3:79–87.
  20. Kevin G. Jamieson and Robert D. Nowak. 2011. Active ranking using pairwise comparisons. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24: 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2011. Proceedings of a meeting held 12-14 December 2011, Granada, Spain, pages 2240–2248.
  21. LAION-AI. 2023. Open assistant. https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant.
  22. BART: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7871–7880, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  23. CommonGen: A constrained text generation challenge for generative commonsense reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 1823–1840, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. ArXiv preprint, abs/1907.11692.
  25. Yixin Liu and Pengfei Liu. 2021. SimCLS: A simple framework for contrastive learning of abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 1065–1072, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  26. NLP Team MosaicML. 2023. Introducing mpt-7b: A new standard for open-source, ly usable llms. Accessed: 2023-05-23.
  27. Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNNs and beyond. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 280–290, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. ArXiv preprint, abs/2203.02155.
  29. Maja Popović. 2015. chrF: character n-gram F-score for automatic MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 392–395, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  30. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21:140:1–140:67.
  31. SummaReranker: A multi-task mixture-of-experts re-ranking framework for abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4504–4524, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  32. Towards summary candidates fusion. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 8488–8504, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Omer Sagi and Lior Rokach. 2018. Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8.
  34. Masked language model scoring. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2699–2712, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  35. BLEURT: Learning robust metrics for text generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7881–7892, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  36. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net.
  37. Noam Shazeer and Mitchell Stern. 2018. Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm, Sweden, July 10-15, 2018, volume 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4603–4611. PMLR.
  38. Stability-AI. 2023. Stablelm: Stability ai language models. https://github.com/stability-AI/stableLM.
  39. Tianxiang Sun and Xipeng Qiu. 2023. Moss. https://github.com/OpenLMLab/MOSS.
  40. Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model. https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca.
  41. Jörg Tiedemann and Santhosh Thottingal. 2020a. OPUS-MT – building open translation services for the world. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pages 479–480, Lisboa, Portugal. European Association for Machine Translation.
  42. Jörg Tiedemann and Santhosh Thottingal. 2020b. OPUS-MT – building open translation services for the world. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pages 479–480, Lisboa, Portugal. European Association for Machine Translation.
  43. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2302.13971.
  44. Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions. ArXiv preprint, abs/2212.10560.
  45. Baize: An open-source chat model with parameter-efficient tuning on self-chat data. ArXiv preprint, abs/2304.01196.
  46. Pandalm: Reproducible and automated language model assessment. https://github.com/WeOpenML/PandaLM.
  47. Bartscore: Evaluating generated text as text generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual, pages 27263–27277.
  48. PEGASUS: pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 11328–11339. PMLR.
  49. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with BERT. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
  50. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena.
Citations (178)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel ensemble framework that integrates pairwise ranking and generative fusion to enhance LLM performance.
  • It employs a PairRanker module to compare model outputs and a GenFuser module to generate superior responses from top-ranked candidates.
  • Extensive evaluations demonstrate improved correlation, NLG metrics, and versatility across tasks, setting a new benchmark for ensemble LLM systems.

Analysis of MoLLM: Ensembling LLMs with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion

The research paper "MoLLM: Ensembling LLMs with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion" is a significant contribution to the ongoing efforts to improve the performance of open-source LLMs through ensemble learning. This analysis explores the innovative aspects of the MoLLM framework, its empirical results, and implications for future AI research and practical applications.

Overview of MoLLM Framework

MoLLM, an ensemble learning framework, capitalizes on the complementary strengths of various open-source LLMs by integrating their outputs to generate a consistently superior overall performance. The framework consists of two core modules:

  1. PairRanker: A pairwise ranking module designed to compare and rank outputs from different LLMs through cross-attention encoders, exhibiting the highest correlation with ChatGPT-based rankings.
  2. GenFuser: A generative fusion module that assimilates the top-ranked candidates from PairRanker into a single, improved output.

Methodological Innovations

PairRanker: Pairwise Comparison and Ranking

PairRanker deviates from traditional pointwise ranking methodologies by incorporating a pairwise comparison approach. This approach encodes both the input text and pairs of model outputs, using cross-attention transformers to discern subtle quality differences. The key steps are:

  • Joint Encoding: The inputs and output pairs are concatenated and encoded together, allowing the model to focus on comparative differences.
  • Matrix Aggregation: Pairwise comparisons between all candidate pairs are aggregated into a matrix, upon which various scoring strategies (e.g., MaxLogits, MaxWins) determine the ranking of each candidate output.

This method significantly improves the ranking accuracy by directly comparing outputs, as opposed to individually scoring each one.

GenFuser: Generative Fusion

GenFuser addresses the potential limitations of PairRanker by merging the top KK ranked outputs into a single, enhanced output. Leveraging a seq2seq LLM, GenFuser concatenates the input and selected outputs, and generates a new output that synthesizes the strengths of each candidate while mitigating their individual weaknesses.

Empirical Results

MoLLM's evaluation on the newly introduced MixInstruct benchmark dataset demonstrates substantial improvements over individual LLMs and existing baseline methods. Key performance metrics include:

  • Higher Spearman and Pearson Correlations with GPT-Rank: PairRanker achieves superior correlation in ranking outputs compared to other pointwise ranking models.
  • Enhanced NLG Metrics: Significant gains in BERTScore, BARTScore, and BLEURT across various instruction-following tasks.
  • Broad Applicability: The pairwise ranking and generative fusion framework substantially outperformed fixed model selections as well as improved robustness and generalization across multiple tasks including summarization, machine translation, and constrained text generation.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

MoLLM offers significant practical benefits:

  • Improved Performance: By dynamically selecting and fusing outputs, MoLLM ensures consistently better performance than any single LLM.
  • Reduced Bias and Uncertainty: Integrating multiple outputs helps in mitigating individual model biases and errors, leading to more reliable and accurate results.
  • Flexible Deployment: The framework is designed to work efficiently with various open-source LLMs, making it accessible for broader use in AI applications requiring robust natural language understanding and generation capabilities.

From a theoretical perspective, MoLLM expands upon traditional ensemble learning by introducing novel ranking and fusion mechanisms tailored for LLM-generated content. This work underscores the potential of pairwise comparison and generative fusion in overcoming the limitations associated with individual model-centric approaches.

Future Directions

Potential future research directions emanating from this paper include:

  • Extending to Other Modalities: Adaptation of the MoLLM framework to non-text modalities such as visual data or multi-modal inputs.
  • Active Learning Integration: Developing adaptive learning strategies that incorporate active learning to fine-tune the ensemble framework based on real-time feedback.
  • Scalability Improvements: Reducing computational overhead associated with pairwise comparisons and exploring more efficient fusion mechanisms to enhance scalability and deployment efficiency.

Conclusion

The MoLLM framework represents a significant advancement in ensembling methods for LLMs, demonstrating substantial performance improvements in various metrics across instruction-following tasks. By employing a robust combination of pairwise ranking and generative fusion, MoLLM sets a new benchmark for future research and applied AI systems, promising enhanced accuracy, robustness, and generalization in real-world AI applications.

Note: The numerical results and empirical data presented (e.g., BERTScore, GPT-Rank, BLEURT) are drawn directly from the research paper to maintain the integrity of the analysis.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com