Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Consistency-guided Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models (2306.01195v4)

Published 1 Jun 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: We propose Consistency-guided Prompt learning (CoPrompt), a new fine-tuning method for vision-LLMs. Our approach improves the generalization of large foundation models when fine-tuned on downstream tasks in a few-shot setting. The basic idea of CoPrompt is to enforce a consistency constraint in the prediction of the trainable and pre-trained models to prevent overfitting on the downstream task. Additionally, we introduce the following two components into our consistency constraint to further boost the performance: enforcing consistency on two perturbed inputs and combining two dominant paradigms of tuning, prompting and adapter. Enforcing consistency on perturbed input serves to further regularize the consistency constraint, thereby improving generalization. Moreover, the integration of adapters and prompts not only enhances performance on downstream tasks but also offers increased tuning flexibility in both input and output spaces. This facilitates more effective adaptation to downstream tasks in a few-shot learning setting. Experiments show that CoPrompt outperforms existing methods on a range of evaluation suites, including base-to-novel generalization, domain generalization, and cross-dataset evaluation. On generalization, CoPrompt improves the state-of-the-art on zero-shot tasks and the overall harmonic mean over 11 datasets. Detailed ablation studies show the effectiveness of each of the components in CoPrompt. We make our code available at https://github.com/ShuvenduRoy/CoPrompt.

Consistency-Guided Prompt Learning for Vision-LLMs: An Expert Analysis

The paper, titled "Consistency-guided Prompt Learning for Vision-LLMs," introduces a novel fine-tuning framework for vision-language foundation models, specifically designed to enhance their generalization capabilities in few-shot learning scenarios while mitigating overfitting. The proposed method, dubbed CoPrompt, leverages a consistency constraint to align the embeddings generated by fine-tuned models with those from the original pre-trained models, thereby preserving the generalization capacity of these foundational architectures.

Framework and Methodology

CoPrompt employs a dual strategy to refine vision-LLMs, combining the strengths of prompt-based and adapter-based tuning techniques within its architecture. This dual approach is key to its success, as it simultaneously fine-tunes both input prompts and internal network parameters, fostering a more flexible adaptation to new tasks.

  1. Consistency Constraint: The cornerstone of the CoPrompt framework is its emphasis on maintaining consistent representations between the fine-tuned and the pre-trained models. This is achieved by enforcing a constraints that align the embeddings of both models across the language and image components. Unlike conventional methodologies that potentially diverge the output representations of fine-tuned models from their pre-trained origins, CoPrompt's approach reduces such deviations, thus enhancing model robustness.
  2. Input Perturbations: To bolster the regularizing effect of the consistency constraint, CoPrompt introduces two perturbations: the use of LLMs to generate descriptive text inputs and the application of image augmentation techniques. These perturbations act as a training regularizer, further aligning the invariant representations across varied input instances.
  3. Integration of Prompts and Adapters: One of the novel contributions of CoPrompt is its integration of multi-modal prompt tuning with feature adapters. The framework uses LLM-generated prompts on the text side and learnable adapters near the prediction head. This paradigm not only improves downstream task performance but also extends flexibility in tuning different dimensions of the model, thus facilitating effective few-shot learning.

Empirical Evaluation

CoPrompt's effectiveness is substantiated through comprehensive experiments across several benchmarks, including base-to-novel class generalization, cross-dataset evaluation, and domain generalization tasks. Compared to existing techniques, CoPrompt sets a new performance benchmark:

  • Base-to-Novel Generalization: It achieves substantial improvements over the state-of-the-art on 11 benchmark datasets, with a marked increase in the harmonic mean of base and novel categories.
  • Cross-Dataset Evaluation: CoPrompt shows superior generalization, as evidenced by its ability to transfer learning across diverse datasets.
  • Zero-shot Learning: The framework demonstrates improved zero-shot generalization without sacrificing base task performance, highlighting its capability to maintain the innate adaptability of pre-trained models.

Implications and Future Outlook

The introduction of CoPrompt marks a significant advance in the field of vision-LLM fine-tuning, providing a robust mechanism to enhance model versatility and performance. The dual approach of integrating consistency constraints with prompt-adapter tuning could be a promising direction for expanding the utility of foundation models beyond few-shot learning tasks to broader application areas.

In practical terms, the methodology holds promise for enhancing model performance in real-world applications where adaptable, robust machine learning solutions are necessary. Furthermore, the paradigm set by CoPrompt could lead to further research into hybrid strategies that blend multiple tuning techniques, particularly those that target the innate generalization capabilities of foundation models.

In conclusion, CoPrompt represents a promising advancement in the field of model fine-tuning, with implications that extend well into future developments in AI and machine learning applications. Its dual-faceted approach not only sets new performance standards but also paves the way for innovative adaptations of existing foundational models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Exploring visual prompts for adapting large-scale models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17274, 2022.
  2. Food-101–mining discriminative components with random forests. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  446–461, 2014.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. pp.  1877–1901, 2020.
  4. Vision transformer adapter for dense predictions. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  5. Describing textures in the wild. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  3606–3613, 2014.
  6. Randaugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp.  702–703, 2020.
  7. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  248–255, 2009.
  8. Bayesian prompt learning for image-language model generalization. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  15237–15246, 2023.
  9. Eva: Exploring the limits of masked visual representation learning at scale. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  19358–19369, 2023.
  10. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp.  178–178, 2004.
  11. Clip-adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters. International Journal of Computer Vision, pp.  1–15, 2023.
  12. Eurosat: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(7):2217–2226, 2019.
  13. The many faces of robustness: A critical analysis of out-of-distribution generalization. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  8340–8349, 2021a.
  14. Natural adversarial examples. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  15262–15271, 2021b.
  15. Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  4904–4916, 2021.
  16. Maple: Multi-modal prompt learning. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  19113–19122, 2023a.
  17. Self-regulating prompts: Foundational model adaptation without forgetting. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  15190–15200, 2023b.
  18. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  554–561, 2013.
  19. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.  3045–3059, 2021.
  20. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp.  4582–4597, 2021.
  21. P-tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07602, 2021.
  22. Prompt distribution learning. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  5206–5215, 2022.
  23. Fine-grained visual classification of aircraft. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.5151, 2013.
  24. Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, pp.  722–729, 2008.
  25. Cats and dogs. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  3498–3505, 2012.
  26. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  8748–8763, 2021.
  27. Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  18082–18091, 2022.
  28. Do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet? In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  5389–5400, 2019.
  29. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0402, 2012.
  30. Learning robust global representations by penalizing local predictive power. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, 2019.
  31. Zero-shot learning-the good, the bad and the ugly. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  4582–4591, 2017.
  32. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  3485–3492, 2010.
  33. Visual-language prompt tuning with knowledge-guided context optimization. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  6757–6767, 2023.
  34. Filip: Fine-grained interactive language-image pre-training. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  35. Florence: A new foundation model for computer vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.11432, 2021.
  36. Lit: Zero-shot transfer with locked-image text tuning. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  18123–18133, 2022.
  37. Learning to prompt for vision-language models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(9):2337–2348, 2022a.
  38. Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  16816–16825, 2022b.
  39. Prompt-aligned gradient for prompt tuning. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  15659–15669, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Shuvendu Roy (18 papers)
  2. Ali Etemad (118 papers)
Citations (25)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com