Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback (2305.14387v4)

Published 22 May 2023 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CL

Abstract: LLMs such as ChatGPT have seen widespread adoption due to their strong instruction-following abilities. Developing these LLMs involves a complex yet poorly understood workflow requiring training with human feedback. Replicating and understanding this instruction-following requires tackling three major challenges: the high cost of data collection, the lack of trustworthy evaluation, and the absence of reference method implementations. We address these challenges with AlpacaFarm, a simulator that enables research and development for learning from feedback at a low cost. First, we design LLM prompts to simulate human feedback that are 50x cheaper than crowdworkers and display high agreement with humans. Second, we propose an automatic evaluation and validate it against human instructions obtained on real-world interactions. Third, we contribute reference implementations for several methods (PPO, DPO, best-of-n, expert iteration, and more) that learn from pairwise feedback. Finally, as an end-to-end validation of AlpacaFarm, we train and evaluate eleven models on 10k pairs of real human feedback and show that rankings of models trained in AlpacaFarm match rankings of models trained on human data. As a demonstration of the research possible in AlpacaFarm, we find that methods that use a reward model can substantially improve over supervised fine-tuning and that our reference PPO implementation leads to a +10% improvement in win-rate against Davinci003. We release all components of AlpacaFarm at https://github.com/tatsu-lab/alpaca_farm.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (75)
  1. Using large language models to simulate multiple humans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10264, 2022.
  2. Thinking fast and slow with deep learning and tree search. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  3. Out of one, many: Using language models to simulate human samples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06899, 2022.
  4. Ext5: Towards extreme multi-task scaling for transfer learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10952, 2021.
  5. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment, 2021.
  6. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2022.
  7. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, 2022.
  8. Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:38176–38189, 2022.
  9. R. Bommasani et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
  10. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3/4):324–345, 1952.
  11. Openai gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540, 2016.
  12. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020.
  13. Improving code generation by training with natural language feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16749, 2023.
  14. Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01937, 2023.
  15. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90% chatgpt quality, March 2023.
  16. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  17. Surreal: Open-source reinforcement learning framework and robot manipulation benchmark. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 767–782. PMLR, 2018.
  18. Brax–a differentiable physics engine for large scale rigid body simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13281, 2021.
  19. Scaling laws for reward model overoptimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10760, 2022.
  20. Koala: A dialogue model for academic research, March 2023.
  21. Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14375, 2022.
  22. Learning from dialogue after deployment: Feed yourself, chatbot! arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.05415, 2019.
  23. Unity: A general platform for intelligent agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02627, 2018.
  24. An alternate objective function for Markovian fields. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2002.
  25. Ai personification: Estimating the personality of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12000, 2022.
  26. CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05858, 2019.
  27. Revisiting the weaknesses of reinforcement learning for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08942, 2021.
  28. Pretraining language models with human preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08582, 2023.
  29. Can neural machine translation be improved with user feedback? arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.05958, 2018.
  30. A reinforcement learning approach to interactive-predictive neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01553, 2018.
  31. Aligning text-to-image models using human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12192, 2023.
  32. Dialogue learning with human-in-the-loop. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09823, 2016.
  33. Chain of hindsight aligns language models with feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02676, 2023.
  34. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485, 2023.
  35. G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignmentg. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16634, 2023.
  36. The flan collection: Designing data and methods for effective instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13688, 2023.
  37. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  38. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27591–27609, 2022.
  39. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17651, 2023.
  40. Cross-task generalization via natural language crowdsourcing instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08773, 2021.
  41. Reinforcement learning for bandit neural machine translation with simulated human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07402, 2017.
  42. OpenAI. Introducing chatgpt.
  43. OpenAI. Model index for researchers.
  44. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  45. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback, 2022.
  46. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023.
  47. Social simulacra: Creating populated prototypes for social computing systems. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 1–18, 2022.
  48. A deep reinforced model for abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.04304, 2017.
  49. Instruction tuning with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277, 2023.
  50. Discovering language model behaviors with model-written evaluations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09251, 2022.
  51. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18290, 2023.
  52. Is reinforcement learning (not) for natural language processing?: Benchmarks, baselines, and building blocks for natural language policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01241, 2022.
  53. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08207, 2021.
  54. Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05802, 2022.
  55. Training language models with language feedback at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16755, 2023.
  56. High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438, 2015.
  57. Proximal policy optimization algorithms, 2017.
  58. When life gives you lemons, make cherryade: Converting feedback from bad responses into good labels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.15893, 2022.
  59. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676):354–359, 2017.
  60. Offline rl for natural language generation with implicit language q learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11871, 2022.
  61. Bandit structured prediction for learning from partial feedback in statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04468, 2016.
  62. Learning to summarize from human feedback, 2020.
  63. Lyceum: An efficient and scalable ecosystem for robot learning. In Learning for Dynamics and Control, pages 793–803. PMLR, 2020.
  64. Alpaca: A strong, replicable instruction-following modely, March 2023.
  65. Deepmind control suite. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00690, 2018.
  66. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pages 5026–5033. IEEE, 2012.
  67. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  68. Turingbench: A benchmark environment for turing test in the age of neural text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13296, 2021.
  69. Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback, 2022.
  70. Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions, 2022.
  71. Super-naturalinstructions: Generalization via declarative instructions on 1600+ nlp tasks. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5085–5109, 2022.
  72. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652, 2021.
  73. J. E. Weston. Dialog-based language learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 829–837, 2016.
  74. Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144, 2016.
  75. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05685, 2023.
Citations (435)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces AlpacaFarm, a simulation sandbox that reduces human feedback collection costs by 50x using oracle API LLMs.
  • The paper validates an automatic evaluation protocol with a 0.98 Spearman correlation to real human feedback, enabling rapid LLM development.
  • The paper provides reference implementations for methods like PPO and best-of-n sampling, demonstrating significant performance gains with low computational overhead.

AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback

The work titled "AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback" introduces AlpacaFarm, a comprehensive simulation sandbox designed to facilitate the research and development of LLMs optimized for instruction-following capabilities using human feedback. In recent years, LLMs such as ChatGPT have demonstrated unprecedented proficiency in adhering to diverse and open-ended instructions, largely attributed to fine-tuning with human feedback. Despite these advancements, the process remains poorly elucidated due to several challenges: the high cost of data collection, unreliable evaluation methods, and the lack of standardized reference implementations for different learning methods.

Core Contributions

The AlpacaFarm framework addresses the aforementioned barriers through several notable innovations:

  1. Cost-effective Data Collection: By designing prompts for oracle API LLMs to simulate human feedback, the framework reduces data collection costs by a factor of 50 compared to crowdworkers. The simulated feedback closely aligns with human judgment, mitigating the financial and logistical burdens of extensive human annotation.
  2. Validated Automatic Evaluation Protocol: The paper proposes and validates an automated evaluation protocol that correlates well with evaluations based on human instructions from real-world interactions. This enables the rapid iteration and development of methods that can be expected to perform similarly when transferred to actual human feedback environments.
  3. Reference Implementations for Various Learning Methods: The framework includes reference implementations for several popular methods such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), best-of-n sampling, and expert iteration, among others. These implementations provide a baseline for performance and facilitate method comparison.

Simulated Feedback Validation

To ensure the credibility of the simulated feedback, the authors engaged in a thorough validation process. The simulated annotators were designed with considerable variability to capture the nuances of human feedback, including inter-annotator differences and potential biases. These annotators exhibited an agreement rate comparable to human annotations, further validating the effectiveness of AlpacaFarm as a proxy for human feedback.

End-to-End Model Evaluation

The simulation paradigm was subjected to an end-to-end validation by training and evaluating eleven different models on real human feedback and comparing the rankings with models trained in the AlpacaFarm environment. The high Spearman correlation (0.98) between the rankings solidifies the utility of AlpacaFarm as a robust simulation framework for developing instruction-following models.

Method Performance and Impact

Key findings reveal that methods utilizing reward models, such as PPO, significantly outperform those relying on supervised fine-tuning alone. For instance, the PPO-enhanced model displayed a notable 10% improvement in win-rate against the Davinci003 model. Additionally, best-of-n sampling emerged as a competitive inference-time method, particularly when combined with effective surrogate reward models.

Computational Efficiency

The paper underscores the efficiency of different LPF methods, noting that most methods required less than two hours of compute time on a standard machine setup. This computational feasibility ensures that the AlpacaFarm framework can be widely adopted without extraordinary resource requirements.

Future Directions

The implications of this research are multifaceted. Practically, AlpacaFarm offers a scalable, cost-effective solution for developing advanced LLMs with minimal human intervention. Theoretically, it opens avenues for further exploration into the optimization of surrogate reward models and the enhancement of simulation fidelity. Future research could extend AlpacaFarm to support more complex interactions and integrate additional sources of human feedback.

Conclusion

AlpacaFarm represents a pivotal advancement in the paper and development of instruction-following models. Its innovative approach to simulating human feedback, validated automatic evaluation protocol, and comprehensive reference implementations mark significant strides toward demystifying and optimizing the fine-tuning processes of LLMs. Consequently, AlpacaFarm not only reduces the barriers to entry for researchers but also provides a solid foundation for future advancements in artificial intelligence.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube