Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
72 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
61 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond (2304.13712v2)

Published 26 Apr 2023 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG
Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive and practical guide for practitioners and end-users working with LLMs in their downstream NLP tasks. We provide discussions and insights into the usage of LLMs from the perspectives of models, data, and downstream tasks. Firstly, we offer an introduction and brief summary of current GPT- and BERT-style LLMs. Then, we discuss the influence of pre-training data, training data, and test data. Most importantly, we provide a detailed discussion about the use and non-use cases of LLMs for various natural language processing tasks, such as knowledge-intensive tasks, traditional natural language understanding tasks, natural language generation tasks, emergent abilities, and considerations for specific tasks.We present various use cases and non-use cases to illustrate the practical applications and limitations of LLMs in real-world scenarios. We also try to understand the importance of data and the specific challenges associated with each NLP task. Furthermore, we explore the impact of spurious biases on LLMs and delve into other essential considerations, such as efficiency, cost, and latency, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of deploying LLMs in practice. This comprehensive guide aims to provide researchers and practitioners with valuable insights and best practices for working with LLMs, thereby enabling the successful implementation of these models in a wide range of NLP tasks. A curated list of practical guide resources of LLMs, regularly updated, can be found at \url{https://github.com/Mooler0410/LLMsPracticalGuide}.

Insights and Applications of LLMs: A Comprehensive Analysis

In "Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond," the authors present an exhaustive examination of LLMs, with a focus on their application in NLP tasks. This paper serves as a vital resource for researchers and practitioners, offering a detailed understanding of the practical deployment of LLMs.

Overview of LLMs

The paper categorizes LLMs into two primary architectures: BERT-style (encoder-decoder or encoder-only) and GPT-style (decoder-only). Each has distinct training paradigms and use cases. Transformer-based decoder-only models, such as GPT-3 and GPT-4, are notably dominant, driven by superior few-shot and zero-shot capabilities. Encoder-decoder models like T5, on the other hand, focus on tasks requiring masked LLMing. The evolutionary trajectory of these models highlights the trend toward closed-source proprietary models, alongside substantial contributions from entities like Meta and Google in open-source projects.

Importance of Data

The role of data is central to the efficacy of LLMs. The authors emphasize the impact of pre-training, fine-tuning, and test data on model performance. They advocate for the selection of models trained on data similar to downstream tasks, noting that LLMs outperform fine-tuned models in scenarios with limited annotated data or distribution shifts. The robustness of LLMs against adversarial and out-of-distribution examples is a notable advantage over traditional fine-tuned models.

Task-Specific Analysis

  1. Traditional NLP Tasks: The paper highlights the superior performance of fine-tuned models on structured tasks like named entity recognition and text classification, primarily due to their tailored architecture and training data.
  2. Generation Tasks: LLMs demonstrate a marked advantage in open-ended text generation, summarization, and translation. The ability to generate coherent, contextually relevant text underpins their effectiveness in these areas. The paper discusses the strong performance of models like GPT-4 in diverse language generation applications.
  3. Knowledge-Intensive Tasks: The inherent knowledge accumulation in LLMs, thanks to vast pre-training datasets, allows them to excel in domains requiring extensive background knowledge. However, fine-tuned models can be competitive when augmented with retrieval mechanisms.
  4. Emergent Abilities: As models scale, unexpected capabilities such as reasoning and word manipulation emerge. These abilities are not observed in smaller models and present new opportunities for NLP task applications.
  5. Real-World Tasks: The adaptability of LLMs to unstructured and noisy input scenarios makes them preferable for real-world applications. Instruction tuning and human feedback mechanisms are suggested as methods to enhance alignment with user expectations.

Efficiency and Trustworthiness

While LLMs offer substantial capabilities, the paper addresses practical concerns such as computational cost, latency, and parameter-efficient tuning methods. In terms of trustworthiness, it discusses robustness, fairness, hallucinations, and safety concerns — areas requiring further research to ensure responsible deployment.

Future Directions

The paper underscores several challenges for future research, including better evaluation methodologies for real-world datasets, enhanced model alignment with human values, addressing safety concerns, and predicting performance scaling. These challenges indicate a pathway for the continued development of LLMs in both theoretical and practical dimensions.

Overall, this survey presents a comprehensive guide to the utilization of LLMs, providing essential insights and best practices for deploying these models effectively across various NLP tasks. It serves as a foundational reference for researchers seeking to explore and expand the applications of LLMs in the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Jingfeng Yang (31 papers)
  2. Hongye Jin (15 papers)
  3. Ruixiang Tang (44 papers)
  4. Xiaotian Han (46 papers)
  5. Qizhang Feng (9 papers)
  6. Haoming Jiang (52 papers)
  7. Bing Yin (56 papers)
  8. Xia Hu (186 papers)
Citations (464)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com