Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Prediction of the evolution of the nuclear reactor core parameters using artificial neural network (2304.10337v2)

Published 20 Apr 2023 in cs.LG

Abstract: A nuclear reactor based on MIT BEAVRS benchmark was used as a typical power generating Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR). The PARCS v3.2 nodal-diffusion core simulator was used as a full-core reactor physics solver to emulate the operation of a reactor and to generate training, and validation data for the ANN. The ANN was implemented with dedicated Python 3.8 code with Google's TensorFlow 2.0 library. The effort was based to a large extent on the process of appropriate automatic transformation of data generated by PARCS simulator, which was later used in the process of the ANN development. Various methods that allow obtaining better accuracy of the ANN predicted results were studied, such as trying different ANN architectures to find the optimal number of neurons in the hidden layers of the network. Results were later compared with the architectures proposed in the literature. For the selected best architecture predictions were made for different core parameters and their dependence on core loading patterns. In this study, a special focus was put on the prediction of the fuel cycle length for a given core loading pattern, as it can be considered one of the targets for plant economic operation. For instance, the length of a single fuel cycle depending on the initial core loading pattern was predicted with very good accuracy (>99%). This work contributes to the exploration of the usefulness of neural networks in solving nuclear reactor design problems. Thanks to the application of ANN, designers can avoid using an excessive amount of core simulator runs and more rapidly explore the space of possible solutions before performing more detailed design considerations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. International energy agency. www.iea.org. 2018.
  2. Steven Arndt. Regulatory oversight of nuclear power plant digital technology use: An update. Nuclear News, 02 2015.
  3. Nuclear information: An overview of iaea’s activities. IAEA BULLETIN, 1986.
  4. C.J. Sullivan and J. Stinnett. Validation of a bayesian-based isotope identification algorithm. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 784:298–305, 2015. Symposium on Radiation Measurements and Applications 2014 (SORMA XV).
  5. The development of a novel adaptive genetic algorithm for the optimization of fuel cycle length. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 155:108153, 2021.
  6. Optimization of the loading pattern of the pwr core using genetic algorithms and multi-purpose fitness function. Nukleonika, 66(4):147–151, 2021.
  7. Application of support vector machine to rapid classification of uranium waste drums using low-resolution γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-ray spectra. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 104:143–146, 2015.
  8. Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(3):759–762, 2009.
  9. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16, page 481–490, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery.
  10. Status of research and development of learning-based approaches in nuclear science and engineering: A review. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 359:110479, 2020.
  11. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR, abs/1412.6980, 2014.
  12. Henry J Kelley. Gradient theory of optimal flight paths. Ars Journal, 30(10):947–954, 1960.
  13. Purdue advanced reactor core simulator. https://engineering.purdue.edu/PARCS.
  14. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015. Software available from tensorflow.org.
  15. NVIDIA Corporation. Nvidia CUDA Deep Neural Network. https://developer.nvidia.com/cudnn.
  16. Analysis of the beavrs pwr benchmark using scale and parcs. Nukleonika, 64, 2019.
  17. Parcs v3. 0 us nrc core neutronics simulator user/theory manual. University of Michigan Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2009.
  18. User manual for the parcs v3. 0 us nrc core neutronics simulator. Technical report, UM-NERS-09-0001, January, 2012.
  19. Nuclear reactor analysis. Wiley, 1976.
  20. MIT Computa tional Reactor Physics Group. Beavrs – benchmark for evaluation and validationof reactor simulations. rev. 2.0.2. https://crpg.mit.edu/sites/default/files/css_injector_im-ages_image/BEAVRS_2.0.2_spec.pdf, 2018.
  21. François Chollet et al. Keras. https://keras.io, 2015.
  22. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011.
  23. J. Heaton. Introduction to Neural Networks with Java. Heaton Research, 2008.
  24. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. CoRR, abs/1207.0580, 2012.
  25. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Yee Whye Teh and Mike Titterington, editors, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 9 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 249–256, Chia Laguna Resort, Sardinia, Italy, 13–15 May 2010. PMLR.
  26. Bridging nonlinearities and stochastic regularizers with gaussian error linear units. CoRR, abs/1606.08415, 2016.
  27. Alexander LeNail. Nn-svg: Publication-ready neural network architecture schematics. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(33):747, 2019.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.