RED-PSM: Regularization by Denoising of Factorized Low Rank Models for Dynamic Imaging (2304.03483v4)
Abstract: Dynamic imaging addresses the recovery of a time-varying 2D or 3D object at each time instant using its undersampled measurements. In particular, in the case of dynamic tomography, only a single projection at a single view angle may be available at a time, making the problem severely ill-posed. We propose an approach, RED-PSM, which combines for the first time two powerful techniques to address this challenging imaging problem. The first, are non-parametric factorized low rank models, also known as partially separable models (PSMs), which have been used to efficiently introduce a low-rank prior for the spatio-temporal object. The second is the recent Regularization by Denoising (RED), which provides a flexible framework to exploit the impressive performance of state-of-the-art image denoising algorithms, for various inverse problems. We propose a partially separable objective with RED and a computationally efficient and scalable optimization scheme with variable splitting and ADMM. Theoretical analysis proves the convergence of our objective to a value corresponding to a stationary point satisfying the first-order optimality conditions. Convergence is accelerated by a particular projection-domain-based initialization. We demonstrate the performance and computational improvements of our proposed RED-PSM with a learned image denoiser by comparing it to a recent deep-prior-based method known as TD-DIP. Although the main focus is on dynamic tomography, we also show performance advantages of RED-PSM in a cardiac dynamic MRI setting.
- E. Maire et al., “20 Hz X-ray tomography during an in situ tensile test,” International Journal of Fracture, 2016.
- I. Danad et al., “Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography,” European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 836–844, 03 2016.
- P. J. Keall et al., “Acquiring 4D thoracic CT scans using a multislice helical method,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 49, no. 10, p. 2053, 2004.
- A. Scanziani et al., “In situ characterization of immiscible three-phase flow at the pore scale for a water-wet carbonate rock,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 121, pp. 446–455, 2018.
- J. O’Connor et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI,” Brit. J. Radiol., vol. 84, pp. S112–S120, 2011.
- B. M. Patterson et al., “In situ X-ray synchrotron tomographic imaging during the compression of hyper-elastic polymeric materials,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 171–187, 2016.
- B. M. Patterson et al., “Synchrotron CT imaging of lattice structures with engineered defects,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 55, no. 25, 2020.
- M. Salerno et al., “Recent advances in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: techniques and applications,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 10, no. 6, 2017.
- Z.-P. Liang, “Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2007, pp. 988–991.
- J. P. Haldar and Z.-P. Liang, “Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions: A matrix recovery approach,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., April 2010, pp. 716–719.
- B. Zhao et al., “Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2010, pp. 996–999.
- S. Goud, Y. Hu, and M. Jacob, “Real-time cardiac MRI using low-rank and sparsity penalties,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2010, pp. 988–991.
- Y. Romano et al., “The little engine that could: Regularization by denoising (RED),” SIAM J. Imaging Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1804–1844, 2017.
- J. Yoo et al., “Time-dependent deep image prior for dynamic MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3337–3348, 2021.
- S. V. Venkatakrishnan, C. A. Bouman, and B. Wohlberg, “Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction,” in 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, 2013, pp. 945–948.
- U. S. Kamilov et al., “Plug-and-play methods for integrating physical and learned models in computational imaging: Theory, algorithms, and applications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2023.
- X. Xu et al., “Provable convergence of plug-and-play priors with MMSE denoisers,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 27, pp. 1280–1284, 2020.
- R. Cohen, M. Elad, and P. Milanfar, “Regularization by denoising via fixed-point projection (RED-PRO),” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1374–1406, 2021.
- D. Xue et al., “On the convergence of non-convex phase retrieval with denoising priors,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 4424–4439, 2022.
- E. T. Reehorst and P. Schniter, “Regularization by denoising: Clarifications and new interpretations,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–67, 2018.
- X. Hu and T. Parrish, “Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 691–694, 1994.
- M. E. Brummer et al., “Noquist: Reduced field-of-view imaging by direct Fourier inversion,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 331–342, 2004.
- B. Madore, G. H. Glover, and N. J. Pelc, “Unaliasing by Fourier-encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 813–828, 1999.
- M. Lustig et al., “K-T SPARSE: High Frame Rate Dynamic MRI Exploiting Spatio-Temporal Sparsity,” in Proc. ISMRM, Seattle, 2006, p. 2420.
- U. Gamper, P. Boesiger, and S. Kozerke, “Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 365–373, 2008.
- H. Jung, J. C. Ye, and E. Y. Kim, “Improved k–t BLAST and k–t SENSE using FOCUSS,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 52, no. 11, p. 3201, 2007.
- H. Jung et al., “K-t FOCUSS: A general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 2009.
- Q. Zhao, N. aggarwal, and Y. Bresler, “Dynamic Imaging of Time-Varying Objects,” in Proc. ISMRM 2001, Glasgow, Scotland, Apr. 2001, p. 1776.
- N. Aggarwal, Q. Zhao, and Y. Bresler, “Spatio-temporal modeling and minimum redundancy adaptive acquisition in dynamic MRI,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2002, pp. 737–740.
- N. Aggarwal and Y. Bresler, “Patient-adapted reconstruction and acquisition dynamic imaging method (PARADIGM) for MRI,” Inverse Problems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 0 450 151–04 501 529, 2008.
- B. Sharif et al., “Patient-adaptive reconstruction and acquisition in dynamic imaging with sensitivity encoding (PARADISE),” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 501–513, 2010.
- N. P. Willis and Y. Bresler, “Lattice-Theoretic Analysis of Time-Sequential Sampling of Spatio-Temporal Signals Part I,” IEEE Trans. Infor. Theory, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 190–207, Jan. 1997.
- N. P. Willis and Y. Bresler, “Lattice-Theoretic Analysis of Time-Sequential Sampling of Spatio-Temporal Signals Part II: Large Space-Bandwidth-Product Asymptotics,” IEEE Trans. Infor. Theory, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 208–220, Jan. 1997.
- Z.-P. Liang and P. Lauterbur, “An efficient method for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 677–686, Dec. 1994.
- Z.-P. Liang et al., “Dynamic imaging by model estimation,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 551–557, 1997.
- J. Tsao, P. Boesiger, and K. P. Pruessmann, “K-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1031–1042, 2003.
- H. Pedersen et al., “k-t PCA: temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 706–716, 2009.
- C. Brinegar et al., “Improving temporal resolution of pulmonary perfusion imaging in rats using the partially separable functions model,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1162–1170, 2010.
- J. P. Haldar and Z.-P. Liang, “Low-rank approximations for dynamic imaging,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1052–1055.
- B. Zhao et al., “Further development of image reconstruction from highly undersampled (k, t)-space data with joint partial separability and sparsity constraints,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1593–1596.
- B. Zhao et al., “Image reconstruction from highly undersampled (k, t)-space data with joint partial separability and sparsity constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1809–1820, 2012.
- S. G. Lingala and M. Jacob, “Blind compressive sensing dynamic MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1132–1145, 2013.
- Y. Djebra et al., “Manifold learning via linear tangent space alignment (LTSA) for accelerated dynamic MRI with sparse sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2022.
- S. G. Lingala et al., “Accelerated dynamic MRI exploiting sparsity and low-rank structure: kt SLR,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1042–1054, 2011.
- A. Majumdar and R. K. Ward, “An algorithm for sparse MRI reconstruction by Schatten p-norm minimization,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 408–417, Apr. 2011.
- A. Majumdar, R. K. Ward, and T. Aboulnasr, “Non-convex algorithm for sparse and low-rank recovery: Application to dynamic MRI reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 448–455, 2013.
- A. Majumdar and R. Ward, “Learning space-time dictionaries for blind compressed sensing dynamic MRI reconstruction,” Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 4550–4554, 2015.
- J. Trzasko and A. Manduca, “Local versus Global Low-Rank Promotion in Dynamic MRI Series Reconstruction,” in Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., vol. 24, 2011, p. 4371.
- J. D. Trzasko, “Exploiting local low-rank structure in higher-dimensional MRI applications,” in Wavelets and Sparsity XV, vol. 8858. SPIE, Sep. 2013, pp. 551–558.
- S. G. Lingala, E. DiBella, and M. Jacob, “Deformation corrected compressed sensing (DC-CS): a novel framework for accelerated dynamic MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2014.
- X. Chen et al., “Motion-compensated compressed sensing for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri using regional spatiotemporal sparsity and region tracking: Block low-rank sparsity with motion-guidance (BLOSM),” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1028–1038, 2014.
- H. Yoon et al., “Motion adaptive patch-based low-rank approach for compressed sensing cardiac cine MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2069–2085, 2014.
- A. Tolouee, J. Alirezaie, and P. Babyn, “Nonrigid motion compensation in compressed sensing reconstruction of cardiac cine MRI,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 46, pp. 114–120, 2018.
- B. Trémoulhéac et al., “Dynamic MR image reconstruction–separation from undersampled (k,t)𝑘𝑡(k,t)( italic_k , italic_t )-space via low-rank plus sparse prior,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1689–1701, 2014.
- M. Chiew et al., “k-t FASTER: acceleration of functional MRI data acquisition using low rank constraints,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 353–364, 2015.
- R. Otazo, E. Candes, and D. K. Sodickson, “Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1125–1136, 2015.
- S. Ravishankar et al., “Low-rank and adaptive sparse signal (LASSI) models for highly accelerated dynamic imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1116–1128, 2017.
- S. Babu, S. G. Lingala, and N. Vaswani, “Fast low rank column-wise compressive sensing for accelerated dynamic MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 2023.
- J. Schlemper et al., “A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 491–503, Feb. 2018.
- C. Qin et al., “Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 280–290, Jan. 2019.
- S. Biswas, H. K. Aggarwal, and M. Jacob, “Dynamic MRI using model-based deep learning and SToRM priors: MoDL-SToRM,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 485–494, 2019.
- A. Hauptmann et al., “Real-time cardiovascular MR with spatio-temporal artifact suppression using deep learning–proof of concept in congenital heart disease,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 1143–1156, 2019.
- T. Küstner et al., “CINENet: Deep learning-based 3D cardiac CINE MRI reconstruction with multi-coil complex-valued 4D spatio-temporal convolutions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 13710, Aug. 2020.
- Q. Huang et al., “Dynamic MRI reconstruction with end-to-end motion-guided network,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 68, p. 101901, Feb. 2021.
- Z. Ke et al., “Deep Manifold Learning for Dynamic MR Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 7, pp. 1314–1327, 2021.
- Z. Ke et al., “Learned Low-Rank Priors in Dynamic MR Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3698–3710, Dec. 2021.
- C. M. Sandino et al., “Accelerating cardiac cine MRI using a deep learning-based ESPIRiT reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 152–167, 2021.
- V. Ghodrati et al., “Temporally aware volumetric generative adversarial network-based MR image reconstruction with simultaneous respiratory motion compensation: Initial feasibility in 3D dynamic cine cardiac MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 2666–2683, 2021.
- T. Küstner et al., “LAPNet: Non-Rigid Registration Derived in k-Space for Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3686–3697, Dec. 2021.
- H. Qi et al., “End-to-end deep learning nonrigid motion-corrected reconstruction for highly accelerated free-breathing coronary MRA,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1983–1996, 2021.
- K. Hammernik et al., “Motion-Guided Physics-Based Learning for Cardiac MRI Reconstruction,” Proc. IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 900–907, Oct. 2021.
- S. Wang et al., “DIMENSION: Dynamic MR imaging with both k-space and spatial prior knowledge obtained via multi-supervised network training,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 35, no. 4, p. e4131, 2022.
- Q. Zou et al., “Dynamic imaging using a deep generative storm (Gen-SToRM) model,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3102–3112, 2021.
- A. H. Ahmed et al., “Dynamic imaging using deep bi-linear unsupervised representation (DEBLUR),” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2693–2703, 2022.
- N. P. Willis and Y. Bresler, “Tomographic imaging of time-varying distributions,” in Biomedical Image Processing, vol. 1245. SPIE, 1990, pp. 111–123.
- P. Willis and Y. Bresler, “Optimal scan for time-varying tomography. I. Theoretical analysis and fundamental limitations,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 642–653, 1995.
- N. Willis and Y. Bresler, “Optimal scan for time-varying tomography. II. Efficient design and experimental validation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 654–666, 1995.
- C. Jailin and S. Roux, “Dynamic tomographic reconstruction of deforming volumes,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 8, 2018.
- G. Zang et al., “Space-time tomography for continuously deforming objects,” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 100:1–100:14, Jul. 2018.
- C. Jailin et al., “Projection-based dynamic tomography,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 66, no. 21, p. 215018, 2021.
- S. Capostagno et al., “Deformable motion compensation for interventional cone-beam CT,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 66, no. 5, p. 055010, Feb. 2021.
- M. Burger et al., “A variational reconstruction method for undersampled dynamic x-ray tomography based on physical motion models,” Inverse Problems, vol. 33, no. 12, p. 124008, 2017.
- B. N. Hahn et al., “Using the Navier-Cauchy equation for motion estimation in dynamic imaging,” Inverse Problems and Imaging, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 1179, 2022.
- L. Brombal et al., “Motion artifacts assessment and correction using optical tracking in synchrotron radiation breast CT,” Medical Physics, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 5343–5355, 2021.
- A. K. George et al., “Time-resolved cardiac CT reconstruction using the ensemble Kalman Filter,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., May 2008, pp. 1489–1492.
- M. D. Butala et al., “Tomographic Imaging of Dynamic Objects With the Ensemble Kalman Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1573–1587, Jul. 2009.
- J. Hakkarainen et al., “Undersampled Dynamic X-Ray Tomography With Dimension Reduction Kalman Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 492–501, Sep. 2019.
- X. Cao et al., “Undersampled dynamic tomography with separated spatial and temporal regularization,” 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, vol. 12304, pp. 288–295, Oct. 2022.
- K. A. Mohan et al., “TIMBIR: A method for time-space reconstruction from interlaced views,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–111, 2015.
- F. Lucka et al., “Enhancing Compressed Sensing 4D Photoacoustic Tomography by Simultaneous Motion Estimation,” SIAM J. Imaging Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2224–2253, Jan. 2018.
- T. A. Bubba et al., “Sparse dynamic tomography: A shearlet-based approach for iodine perfusion in plant stems,” Inverse Problems, vol. 36, no. 9, p. 094002, Sep. 2020.
- H. Gao et al., “Robust principal component analysis-based four-dimensional computed tomography,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 56, no. 11, p. 3181, 2011.
- B. Iskender et al., “Dynamic tomography reconstruction by projection-domain separable modeling,” IEEE 14th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP), 2022.
- B. Iskender et al., “Dynamic tomography reconstruction by projection-domain separable modeling,” arXiv:2204.09935, 2022.
- B. Iskender et al., “Factorized projection-domain spatio-temporal regularization for dynamic tomography,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023.
- S. Zhi et al., “Artifacts reduction method for phase-resolved Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) images via a prior-guided CNN,” Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 10948, pp. 562–567, Mar. 2019.
- X. Huang et al., “U-net-based deformation vector field estimation for motion-compensated 4D-CBCT reconstruction,” Medical Physics, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 3000–3012, 2020.
- F. Madesta et al., “Self-contained deep learning-based boosting of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction,” Medical Physics, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 5619–5631, 2020.
- Z. Zhang et al., “Deep learning-based motion compensation for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) reconstruction,” Medical Physics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 808–820, 2023.
- S. Majee et al., “Multi-slice fusion for sparse-view and limited-angle 4D CT reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 7, pp. 448–462, 2021.
- G. T. Buzzard et al., “Plug-and-play unplugged: Optimization-free reconstruction using consensus equilibrium,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2001–2020, 2018.
- L. Lozenski, M. A. Anastasio, and U. Villa, “A memory-efficient self-supervised dynamic image reconstruction method using neural fields,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 8, pp. 879–892, 2022.
- X. Shi et al., “Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 28, 2015.
- L. Wang et al., “Spatial-temporal transformer for video snapshot compressive imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022.
- N. Ginio et al., “Efficient machine learning method for spatio-temporal water surface waves reconstruction from polarimetric images,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 5, p. 055801, 2023.
- B. Iskender, M. L. Klasky, and Y. Bresler, “RED-PSM: Regularization by denoising of partially separable models for dynamic imaging,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 10 561–10 570, 2023.
- S. Ma et al., “Dynamic MRI reconstruction exploiting partial separability and t-SVD,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Bioinf. and Comput. Bio. (ICBCB). IEEE, 2019, pp. 179–184.
- S. Ma et al., “Dynamic MRI exploiting partial separability and shift invariant discrete wavelet transform,” 6th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC), pp. 242–246, 2021.
- Y. Sun et al., “Block coordinate regularization by denoising,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
- C. Metzler et al., “prDeep: robust phase retrieval with a flexible deep network,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Mach. Learn. (ICML). PMLR, 2018, pp. 3501–3510.
- G. Mataev, P. Milanfar, and M. Elad, “DeepRED: Deep image prior powered by RED,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, 2019.
- S. Boyd et al., “Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2011.
- D. Gabay and B. Mercier, “A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–40, 1976.
- J. Eckstein and D. P. Bertsekas, “On the Douglas—Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 293–318, 1992.
- K. Zhang et al., “Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3142–3155, 2017.
- D. Hajinezhad and Q. Shi, “Alternating direction method of multipliers for a class of nonconvex bilinear optimization: convergence analysis and applications,” J. Glob. Optim., vol. 70, pp. 261–288, 2018.
- Y. Wang et al., “Global convergence of ADMM in nonconvex nonsmooth optimization,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 78, pp. 29–63, 2019.
- R. Cohen et al., “It has potential: Gradient-driven denoisers for convergent solutions to inverse problems,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 18 152–18 164, 2021.
- S. Hurault, A. Leclaire, and N. Papadakis, “Gradient step denoiser for convergent Plug-and-Play,” International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022.
- R. Fermanian, M. Le Pendu, and C. Guillemot, “PnP-ReG: Learned regularizing gradient for plug-and-play gradient descent,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 585–613, 2023.
- A. Berk et al., “Deep proximal gradient method for learned convex regularizers,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5, 2023.
- J. R. Chand and M. Jacob, “Multi-scale energy (MuSE) plug and play framework for inverse problems,” arXiv:2305.04775, 2023.
- M. Udell et al., “Generalized low rank models,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–118, 2016.
- J. D. Rennie and N. Srebro, “Fast maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative prediction,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 713–719, 2005.
- B. Recht, M. Fazel, and P. A. Parrilo, “Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization,” SIAM review, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 471–501, 2010.
- H. Der Sarkissian et al., “A cone-beam X-ray computed tomography data collection designed for machine learning,” Scientific data, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 215, 2019.
- “Piecewise Affine Transformation,” https://scikit-image.org/docs/dev/auto_examples/transform/plot_piecewise_affine.html.
- B. M. Patterson, “Personal communication,” 2022.
- F. Reda et al., “FILM: Frame interpolation for large motion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04901, 2022.
- B. Iskender, M. L. Klasky, and Y. Bresler, “Dynamic tomography reconstruction via low-rank modeling with a red spatial prior,” IEEE 9th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP), pp. 506–510, 2023.
- D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
- O. Bernard et al., “Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved?” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2018.
- S. Kulkarni, J. A. Rumberger, and S. Jha, “Electron beam CT: A historical review,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 216, no. 5, pp. 1222–1228, 2021.
- D. Spronk et al., “Evaluation of carbon nanotube x-ray source array for stationary head computed tomography,” Med. Phys., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1089–1099, 2021.
- S. Xu et al., “Volumetric computed tomography with carbon nanotube x-ray source array for improved image quality and accuracy,” Commun Eng, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2023.
- Z. Wang et al., “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004.