Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Supermassive black hole mass in the massive elliptical galaxy M87 from integral-field stellar dynamics using OASIS and MUSE with adaptive optics: assessing systematic uncertainties (2303.18229v2)

Published 31 Mar 2023 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: The massive elliptical galaxy M87 has been the subject of several supermassive black hole mass measurements from stellar dynamics, gas dynamics, and recently the black hole shadow by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT). This uniquely positions M87 as a benchmark for alternative black hole mass determination methods. Here we use stellar kinematics extracted from integral-field spectroscopy observations with Adaptive Optics (AO) using MUSE and OASIS. We exploit our high-resolution integral field spectroscopy to spectrally decompose the central AGN from the stars. We derive an accurate inner stellar-density profile and find it is flatter than previously assumed. We also use the spectrally-extracted AGN as a reference to accurately determine the observed MUSE and OASIS AO PSF. We then perform Jeans Anisotropic Modelling (JAM), with a new flexible spatially-variable anisotropy, and measure the anisotropy profile, stellar mass-to-light variations, inner dark matter fraction, and black hole mass. Our preferred black hole mass is $M_{\rm BH}=(8.7\pm1.2 [\text{random}] \pm1.3 [\text{systematic}]) \times 109 \ M_\odot $. However, using the inner stellar density from previous studies, we find a preferred black hole mass of $M_{\rm BH} = (5.5{+0.5}_{-0.3}) \times 109 \ M_\odot $, consistent with previous work. We find that this is the primary cause of the difference between our results and previous work, in addition to smaller contributions due to kinematics and modelling method. We conduct numerous systematic tests of the kinematics and model assumptions and conclude that uncertainties in the black hole mass of M87 from previous determinations may have been underestimated and further analyses are needed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.