Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transformations (2303.14002v4)
Abstract: Quantum reference frames are needed in quantum theory for much the same reasons that reference frames are in classical theories: to manifest invariance in line with fundamental relativity principles and to provide a basis for the definition of observable quantities. Though around since the 1960s, and used in a wide range of applications, only recently has the means for transforming descriptions between different quantum reference frames been tackled in detail. In this work, we provide a general, operationally motivated framework for quantum reference frames and their transformations, holding for locally compact groups. The work is built around the notion of operational equivalence, in which quantum states that cannot be physically distinguished are identified. For example, we describe the collection of relative observables as a subspace of the algebra of invariants on the composite of system and frame, and from here the set of relative states is constructed through the identification of states which cannot be distinguished by relative observables. Through the notion of framed observables -- the formation of joint observables of system and frame -- of which the relative observables can be understood as examples, quantum reference frame transformations are then maps between equivalence classes of relative states which respect the framing. We give an explicit realisation in the setting that the initial frame admits a highly localized state with respect to the frame observable. The transformations are invertible exactly when the final frame also has such a localizability property. The procedure we present is in operational agreement with other recent inequivalent constructions on the domain of common applicability, but extends them in a number of ways, and weakens claims of entanglement generation through frame changes.
- F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Nature communications 10, 1 (2019).
- A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley, Quantum 4, 367 (2020).
- P. Busch, M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, Operational quantum physics, Vol. 31 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1997).
- S. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. Spekkens, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007).
- M. C. Palmer, F. Girelli, and S. D. Bartlett, Physical Review A 89, 052121 (2014).
- L. Loveridge, T. Miyadera, and P. Busch, Found. Phys. 48, 135 (2018).
- E. Castro-Ruiz and O. Oreshkov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.13199 (2021).
- M. J. Lake and M. Miller, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03811 (2023).
- C. Rovelli, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35, 1637 (1996).
- E. Adlam and C. Rovelli, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13342 (2022).
- G. Bene and D. Dieks, Foundations of Physics 32, 645 (2002).
- J. Barrett, Physical Review A 75, 032304 (2007).
- L. Loveridge, Quantum measurements in the presence of symmetry, Ph.D. thesis, University of York (2012).
- L. Loveridge, P. Busch, and T. Miyadera, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 117, 40004 (2017).
- T. Miyadera, L. Loveridge, and P. Busch, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 49, 185301 (2016).
- J. Głowacki, L. Loveridge, and J. Waldron, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05354 (2023).
- J. L. Kelley, General topology (Courier Dover Publications, 2017).
- W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, International series in pure and applied mathematics (Tata McGraw-Hill, 1974).
- M. Takesaki, Theory of operator algebras I, 1st ed., Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001).
- G. Godefroy, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 57, 810 (2014).
- S. Sakai, C*-Algebras and W*-Algebras, Ergebnisse der Mathematik Und Ihrer Grenzgebiete (Springer, New York, NY, 1971).
- Z.-J. RUAN, Journal of Operator Theory 27, 179 (1992).
- E. G. Beltrametti and S. Bugajski, Journal of Mathematical Physics 38, 3020 (1997).
- M. Krumm, P. A. Höhn, and M. P. Müller, Quantum 5, 530 (2021).
- P. Billingsley, Convergence of probability measures (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
- J. Głowacki, Operational Quantum Frames, Ph.D. thesis, Center for Theoretical Physics PAS (2023).
- N. P. Landsman, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2, 417 (2006).
- A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1986).
- P. Lahti and J.-P. Pellonpää, Journal of Mathematical Physics 40, 4688 (1999).
- P. Lahti and J.-P. Pellonpää, Journal of Mathematical Physics 41, 7352 (2000).
- S. Mazzucchi, Journal of Mathematical Physics 42, 2477 (2001).
- L. Loveridge, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1638, 012009 (2020).
- L. Loveridge and T. Miyadera, Foundations of Physics 49, 549 (2019).
- W. ARVESON, Notes to a lecture (2008).
- M. Takesaki, Journal of Functional Analysis 9, 306 (1972).
- R. V. Kadison, Contemporary Mathematics 365, 143 (2004).
- P. A. Höhn, M. Krumm, and M. P. Müller, Journal of Mathematical Physics 63, 112207 (2022).
- L. Loveridge and P. Busch, Eur. Phys. J. D 62, 297 (2011).
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.