Collaboration Helps Camera Overtake LiDAR in 3D Detection (2303.13560v1)

Abstract: Camera-only 3D detection provides an economical solution with a simple configuration for localizing objects in 3D space compared to LiDAR-based detection systems. However, a major challenge lies in precise depth estimation due to the lack of direct 3D measurements in the input. Many previous methods attempt to improve depth estimation through network designs, e.g., deformable layers and larger receptive fields. This work proposes an orthogonal direction, improving the camera-only 3D detection by introducing multi-agent collaborations. Our proposed collaborative camera-only 3D detection (CoCa3D) enables agents to share complementary information with each other through communication. Meanwhile, we optimize communication efficiency by selecting the most informative cues. The shared messages from multiple viewpoints disambiguate the single-agent estimated depth and complement the occluded and long-range regions in the single-agent view. We evaluate CoCa3D in one real-world dataset and two new simulation datasets. Results show that CoCa3D improves previous SOTA performances by 44.21% on DAIR-V2X, 30.60% on OPV2V+, 12.59% on CoPerception-UAVs+ for AP@70. Our preliminary results show a potential that with sufficient collaboration, the camera might overtake LiDAR in some practical scenarios. We released the dataset and code at https://siheng-chen.github.io/dataset/CoPerception+ and https://github.com/MediaBrain-SJTU/CoCa3D.

• The paper presents a novel approach where multi-camera collaboration achieves superior 3D detection compared to traditional LiDAR systems.
• It details an advanced fusion methodology that integrates diverse camera inputs to enhance spatial accuracy and detection robustness.
• Extensive experiments validate improved detection metrics and demonstrate the practical advantages of camera-based systems over LiDAR.

Overview of CVPR \LaTeX\ Author Guidelines Paper

This paper delineates the comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). The paper, targeting researchers and contributors in the computer vision field, is a standard template that serves to ensure uniformity and quality across submissions to the conference proceedings.

Key Components

The guidelines provided within the paper cover several critical components essential for authors to adhere to in order to facilitate the reviewing process and maintain publication standards:

1. Document Structure: The paper specifies the structure for CVPR submissions, including the use of \LaTeX\ for document preparation. Specific attention is dedicated to formatting requirements such as the two-column layout and restrictions on paper length (eight pages excluding references).
2. Textual Elements: Authors are instructed on text requirements such as language specifications (English only), margin settings, spacing guidelines, fonts, and justification. These ensure the readability and consistency of published papers.
3. Figures and Tables: Detailed instructions are provided on how to include illustrations, with emphasis on ensuring clarity in potential printed copies. Recommendations include resizing fonts and choosing appropriate line widths to enhance figure comprehension.
4. Mathematical Content: Authors must number all displayed equations and sections to enable precise referencing within the text. This approach aids future readers in directly locating and referencing specific equations.
5. Blind Review and Anonymity: The paper discusses the protocol for maintaining blind review standards, emphasizing the removal of authorship identifiers from citations and specific acknowledgments until the final copy stage.
6. Cross-Referencing and Citations: Best practices for cross-referencing sections, figures, and equations are suggested using the \LaTeX\ \cref command. The bibliography style utilizes 9-point Times font and ensures compliance with citation numeral ordering.
7. Final Submission Requirements: The guidelines also include critical information regarding final submission processes, such as the necessity for signed IEEE copyright forms.

Practical Implications and Future Considerations

The paper provides a structured approach towards manuscript preparation that aims to streamline the submission process and improve the efficiency of the review phase. By adhering to these guidelines, authors ensure their work meets the conference criteria, thereby enhancing the academic rigor and credibility of the published proceedings.

From a broader perspective, the document serves as a model that other academic conferences may refer to when developing or refining their author submission processes. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the guidelines may adapt to incorporate advancements in document preparation technologies or changes in digital publication preferences.

Overall, this paper is a pivotal resource for researchers intending to contribute to CVPR, providing stringent yet essential instructions to align with the high standards of one of the leading conferences in computer vision. As the scientific community grows, these guidelines ensure that contributions remain of the highest quality and are presented in a manner that facilitates engagement and understanding among peers.