Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Interpretable Water Level Forecaster with Spatiotemporal Causal Attention Mechanisms (2303.00515v8)

Published 28 Feb 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ME

Abstract: Accurate forecasting of river water levels is vital for effectively managing traffic flow and mitigating the risks associated with natural disasters. This task presents challenges due to the intricate factors influencing the flow of a river. Recent advances in machine learning have introduced numerous effective forecasting methods. However, these methods lack interpretability due to their complex structure, resulting in limited reliability. Addressing this issue, this study proposes a deep learning model that quantifies interpretability, with an emphasis on water level forecasting. This model focuses on generating quantitative interpretability measurements, which align with the common knowledge embedded in the input data. This is facilitated by the utilization of a transformer architecture that is purposefully designed with masking, incorporating a multi-layer network that captures spatiotemporal causation. We perform a comparative analysis on the Han River dataset obtained from Seoul, South Korea, from 2016 to 2021. The results illustrate that our approach offers enhanced interpretability consistent with common knowledge, outperforming competing methods and also enhances robustness against distribution shift.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Towards flexible groundwater-level prediction for adaptive water management: using facebook’s prophet forecasting approach. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64:1504 – 1518, 2019.
  2. Improving palliative care with deep learning. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18, 2017.
  3. The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1:20–23, 2019.
  4. Neural forecasting: Introduction and literature overview. ArXiv, abs/2004.10240, 2020.
  5. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 16, pp.  213–229. Springer, 2020.
  6. Transformer neural networks for interpretable flood forecasting. Environmental Modelling & Software, 160:105581, 2023.
  7. Spatiotemporal adaptive neural network for long-term forecasting of financial time series. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 132:70–85, 2021.
  8. Forecasting value-at-risk using nonlinear regression quantiles and the intra-day range. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(3):557–574, 2012.
  9. Chevillon, G. Direct multi-step estimation and forecasting. Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economic Surveys, 2006.
  10. Capturing network and dynamic effects in bike sharing system via fused lasso. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08150, 2022.
  11. Extreme precipitation seasonal forecast using a transformer neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06846, 2021.
  12. A spatiotemporal graph convolution-based model for daily runoff prediction in a river network with non-euclidean topological structure. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022.
  13. Interpretable spatio-temporal attention lstm model for flood forecasting. Neurocomputing, 403:348–359, 2020.
  14. Multilayer networks: aspects, implementations, and application in biomedicine. Big Data Analytics, 5(1):2, 2020.
  15. A survey of community detection methods in multilayer networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 35:1–45, 2020.
  16. Prediction of water level in a tidal river using a deep-learning based lstm model. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 51(12):1207–1216, 12 2018.
  17. A deep learning approach for the prediction of retail store sales. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp.  531–537, 2016.
  18. Multilayer networks. J. Complex Networks, 2:203–271, 2013.
  19. Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 2021.
  20. Directed graph deep neural network for multi-step daily streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 607:127515, 2022.
  21. Water level forecasting using spatiotemporal attention-based long short-term memory network. Water, 2022.
  22. Reconsideration of evaluating design flood level at imjin river estuary. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 50(9):617–625, 2017.
  23. Flood water level modeling and prediction using narx neural network: Case study at kelang river. 2014 IEEE 10th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, pp.  204–207, 2014.
  24. Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3):1181–1191, 2020.
  25. Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied soft computing, 90:106181, 2020.
  26. Deep regression forests for age estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  2304–2313, 2018.
  27. The spatial distribution of water quality and sediments characteristics in the han river estuary. Journal of the Geomorphological Association of Korea, 12(4):13–23, 12 2005.
  28. A bias and variance analysis for multistep-ahead time series forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 27:62–76, 2016.
  29. Attention is all you need. ArXiv, abs/1706.03762, 2017.
  30. A multi-horizon quantile recurrent forecaster. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11053, 2017.
  31. Groundwater level modeling framework by combining the wavelet transform with a long short-term memory data-driven model. The Science of the total environment, 783:146948, 2021.
  32. Complexity to forecast flood: Problem definition and spatiotemporal attention lstm solution. Complexity, 2020:1–13, 2020.
  33. A hybrid wavelet-support vector machine model for prediction of lake water level fluctuations using hydro-meteorological data. Measurement, 103:294–301, 2017.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a multilayer network that models spatiotemporal causal relationships to enhance water level forecasting.
  • It employs simple masking techniques in neural networks to enforce causal pathways and significantly boost interpretability.
  • Empirical validation on the Han river dataset demonstrates superior performance and reliable forecast transparency.

Interpretable Water Level Forecaster with Spatiotemporal Causal Attention Mechanisms

Introduction

In the recently published paper, "Interpretable Water Level Forecaster with Spatiotemporal Causal Attention Mechanisms," the authors introduce a pioneering transformer architecture aimed at enhancing interpretability in time series forecasting. The paper stands out by innovatively leveraging simple masking methods to manipulate spatiotemporal relationships during representation learning. This approach not only bolsters the interpretability of outputs but does so in a manner consistent with existing prior knowledge, mapping a novel direction for sequential decision-making processes.

Architectural Innovations

Multilayer Network for Causal Representation

The core of the proposed architecture lies in its multilayer network, adept at modeling causalities within spatiotemporal features. This network delineates spatial and temporal causalities through intricate interactions among nodes, categorized into intra-layer and inter-layer communications, respectively. Such a configuration ensures a robust framework where the causal relationships are not merely suggested but dynamically represented and enforced throughout the learning process.

Implementation in Neural Networks

Transitioning from theory to practice, the paper details the design of a novel architecture geared to encapsulate these multilayer network relationships within a neural network setting. The most striking aspect of this design is its ability to restrict feature learning to adhere to pre-defined causal pathways as specified by the multilayer network. This strategic confinement serves to enhance the model's interpretability significantly, ensuring that the learned representations align with the causal understanding of the system being modeled.

Empirical Evaluation

The Han river dataset serves as the empirical battlefield for the proposed model, chosen due to its heterogeneity encompassing dams, bridges, and precipitation stations, each category bearing unique characteristics. Through meticulous evaluation, the researchers not only underscored the model's heightened interpretability but also its superior performance relative to existing benchmarks in forecasting water levels.

Contributions and Implications

The paper makes several notable contributions:

  • Firstly, the introduction of a multilayer network for spatiotemporal causal representation marks a significant advancement in the quest for interpretability in time series analysis.
  • Secondly, the architectural blueprint set forth for implementing these causal relationships within neural networks opens new avenues for effective and efficient model training.
  • Lastly, the empirical validation of the model against a challenging dataset highlights its practical utility and superior performance, particularly in ensuring interpretability.

From a theoretical perspective, this research broadens our understanding of how causal relationships can be embedded and operationalized within machine learning models, especially concerning time series forecasting. Practically, the model sets a new standard for interpretability in AI tools designed for sequential decision-making, positioning itself as a valuable asset for real-world applications where understanding model predictions is paramount.

Future Directions

Looking forward, the implications of this research span across numerous domains, suggesting a myriad of potential developments. One could envision the extension of this architecture to other complex datasets and forecasting challenges where interpretability is crucial. Moreover, the underlying principles could inspire new models that bridge the gap between high-performance forecasting and the necessity for deep causal understanding in AI systems.

In conclusion, "Interpretable Water Level Forecaster with Spatiotemporal Causal Attention Mechanisms" sets forth a compelling framework that not only advances the frontiers of forecasting accuracy but does so with an unwavering commitment to interpretability. This dual achievement underscores the potential for creating AI systems that are not only powerful but also transparent and understandable, paving the way for their broader acceptance and deployment in critical decision-making processes.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown