Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Maximizing Miner Revenue in Transaction Fee Mechanism Design (2302.12895v3)

Published 24 Feb 2023 in cs.GT

Abstract: Transaction fee mechanism design is a new decentralized mechanism design problem where users bid for space on the blockchain. Several recent works showed that the transaction fee mechanism design fundamentally departs from classical mechanism design. They then systematically explored the mathematical landscape of this new decentralized mechanism design problem in two settings: in the plain setting where no cryptography is employed, and in a cryptography-assisted setting where the rules of the mechanism are enforced by a multi-party computation protocol. Unfortunately, in both settings, prior works showed that if we want the mechanism to incentivize honest behavior for both users as well as miners (possibly colluding with users), then the miner revenue has to be zero. Although adopting a relaxed, approximate notion of incentive compatibility gets around this zero miner-revenue limitation, the scaling of the miner revenue is nonetheless poor. In this paper, we show that if we make a mildly stronger reasonable-world assumption than prior works, we can circumvent the known limitations on miner revenue, and design auctions that generate optimal miner revenue. We also systematically explore the mathematical landscape of transaction fee mechanism design under the new reasonable-world and demonstrate how such assumptions can alter the feasibility and infeasibility landscape.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Towards a game theoretic view of secure computation. In Eurocrypt, 2011.
  2. Distributed computing meets game theory: Robust mechanisms for rational secret sharing and multiparty computation. In PODC, 2006.
  3. Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing. Journal of Cryptology, 24(1), 2011.
  4. The probabilistic method. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  5. Ethereum improvement proposal 1559: Fee market change for eth 1.0 chain. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1559.md.
  6. Towards a functional fee market for cryptocurrencies. CoRR, abs/1901.06830, 2019.
  7. Game-theoretic fairness meets multi-party protocols: The case of leader election. In CRYPTO. Springer-Verlag, 2021.
  8. Game theoretic notions of fairness in multi-party coin toss. In TCC, volume 11239, pages 563–596, 2018.
  9. Foundations of transaction fee mechanism design. In SODA, 2023.
  10. Cryptography and game theory. In AGT, 2007.
  11. Credible, strategyproof, optimal, and bounded expected-round single-item auctions for all distributions. In Mark Braverman, editor, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2022, January 31 - February 3, 2022, Berkeley, CA, USA, volume 215 of LIPIcs, pages 66:1–66:19, 2022.
  12. Encrypted mempools. talk by Justin Drake, Ethereum Foundation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRM0CpGY3sw.
  13. Dynamic posted-price mechanisms for the blockchain transaction-fee market. CoRR, abs/2103.14144, 2021.
  14. Matheus V. X. Ferreira and S. Matthew Weinberg. Credible, truthful, and two-round (optimal) auctions via cryptographic commitments. In Péter Biró, Jason D. Hartline, Michael Ostrovsky, and Ariel D. Procaccia, editors, EC ’20: The 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, Virtual Event, Hungary, July 13-17, 2020, pages 683–712. ACM, 2020.
  15. Collusion-resistant mechanisms for single-parameter agents. In SODA 2005, pages 620–629, 2005.
  16. Rational protocol design: Cryptography against incentive-driven adversaries. In FOCS, 2013.
  17. How fair is your protocol? a utility-based approach to protocol optimality. In PODC, 2015.
  18. Sequential rationality in cryptographic protocols. In FOCS, 2010.
  19. How to play any mental game. In ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC), 1987.
  20. Fair distributed computation of reactive functions. In DISC, volume 9363, pages 497–512, 2015.
  21. Greedy transaction fee mechanisms for (non-)myopic miners, 2022.
  22. Rational secret sharing and multiparty computation. In STOC, 2004.
  23. Rational secure computation and ideal mechanism design. In FOCS, 2005.
  24. Jonathan Katz. Bridging game theory and cryptography: Recent results and future directions. In TCC, 2008.
  25. log*-round game-theoretically-fair leader election. In CRYPTO, 2022.
  26. Cryptography and game theory: Designing protocols for exchanging information. In TCC, 2008.
  27. Redesigning bitcoin’s fee market. In The World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, pages 2950–2956, 2019.
  28. Fairness with an honest minority and a rational majority. In TCC, 2009.
  29. Fruitchains: A fair blockchain. In PODC, 2017.
  30. Tim Roughgarden. Transaction fee mechanism design for the Ethereum blockchain: An economic analysis of EIP-1559. Manuscript, https://timroughgarden.org/papers/eip1559.pdf, 2020.
  31. Tim Roughgarden. Transaction fee mechanism design. In EC, 2021.
  32. What can cryptography do for decentralized mechanism design. In ITCS, 2023.
  33. William Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961.
  34. A complete characterization of game-theoretically fair, multi-party coin toss. In Eurocrypt, 2022.
  35. Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. An Incentive Analysis of Some Bitcoin Fee Designs (Invited Talk). In ICALP 2020.
  36. A note on a lower bound for the smallest singular value. Linear algebra and its Applications, 253(1-3):25–38, 1997.
  37. Bayesian-nash-incentive-compatible mechanism for blockchain transaction fee allocation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13099, 2022.
Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com