Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent (2212.07677v2)

Published 15 Dec 2022 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CL

Abstract: At present, the mechanisms of in-context learning in Transformers are not well understood and remain mostly an intuition. In this paper, we suggest that training Transformers on auto-regressive objectives is closely related to gradient-based meta-learning formulations. We start by providing a simple weight construction that shows the equivalence of data transformations induced by 1) a single linear self-attention layer and by 2) gradient-descent (GD) on a regression loss. Motivated by that construction, we show empirically that when training self-attention-only Transformers on simple regression tasks either the models learned by GD and Transformers show great similarity or, remarkably, the weights found by optimization match the construction. Thus we show how trained Transformers become mesa-optimizers i.e. learn models by gradient descent in their forward pass. This allows us, at least in the domain of regression problems, to mechanistically understand the inner workings of in-context learning in optimized Transformers. Building on this insight, we furthermore identify how Transformers surpass the performance of plain gradient descent by learning an iterative curvature correction and learn linear models on deep data representations to solve non-linear regression tasks. Finally, we discuss intriguing parallels to a mechanism identified to be crucial for in-context learning termed induction-head (Olsson et al., 2022) and show how it could be understood as a specific case of in-context learning by gradient descent learning within Transformers. Code to reproduce the experiments can be found at https://github.com/google-research/self-organising-systems/tree/master/transformers_learn_icl_by_gd .

Analysis of "Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent"

The paper "Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent" explores the mechanisms underlying in-context learning in Transformers by establishing a close relation to gradient-based meta-learning. This work is of particular relevance as it explores the meta-learned abilities of Transformers, shedding light on how they can effectively approximate gradient descent within their forward pass.

Key Contributions

The authors present the following primary contributions:

  1. Weight Construction for Gradient Descent Analogy: They propose a straightforward construction of weights in a linear self-attention layer that enacts a gradient descent step on a regression loss. This construction enables the equivalence of the operations of a single-layer Transformer and gradient descent, demonstrating how Transformer layers can undertake iterative learning processes.
  2. Empirical Validation: The paper shows that when trained on linear regression tasks, the models derived from Gradient Descent (GD) align closely with those obtained by Transformers. This alignment extends to both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks, reinforcing the proposed equivalence.
  3. Iterative Curvature Correction: The research highlights how Transformers can surpass plain gradient descent by learning a mechanism for iterative curvature correction. This allows for an improved convergence rate, emulating more sophisticated gradient-based optimization algorithms.
  4. Non-linear Regression Capabilities: By integrating multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), the researchers enable Transformers to handle non-linear regression tasks. This is achieved by learning linear models on non-linear data representations, offering insights into kernel regression parallels.
  5. Token Construction and Induction Heads: The authors propose that initial Transformer layers could restructure token sequences to facilitate gradient descent learning, lending insights into the potential function of induction heads as assisting this process.

Numerical Findings and Methodological Advancements

The authors present robust numerical evidence indicating near-perfect alignment of trained Transformers with gradient descent models in terms of predicted outcomes and derivative-based measures. They illustrate how trained weights closely follow the derived construction, justifying the hypothesis of an emergent optimization process akin to mesa-optimization.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

This research bridges in-context learning in Transformers with traditional meta-learning through gradient-based methods. The findings suggest that Transformers may inherently develop mechanisms akin to lightweight, adaptive optimizers capable of handling both linear and non-linear tasks effectively. This holds potential implications for improving the interpretability and adaptability of large Transformer models, particularly in settings demanding quick adaptability with limited data.

Future Directions

The paper opens up several avenues for future inquiry:

  • Declarative Nodes: Incorporating deeper forms of optimization within single Transformer layers, enabling them to potentially solve more complex loss landscapes effectively.
  • Scaling and Application to Larger Models: Investigating how these findings apply to broader contexts and complex domains and understanding the implications for large model architectures.
  • Designing Enhanced Architectures: Modifying Transformer architectures or training regimes to intentionally leverage gradient descent-based learning or exploring alternative meta-learning techniques.

Conclusion

"Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent" advances our understanding of the computational underpinnings of Transformers, suggesting that their in-context learning capabilities are not only powerful but also computationally efficient by design. This research provides a foundational perspective that could enhance the development of future AI systems, offering a deeper comprehension of how learning algorithms may be intrinsically embedded within neural architectures.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Johannes von Oswald (21 papers)
  2. Eyvind Niklasson (13 papers)
  3. Ettore Randazzo (11 papers)
  4. João Sacramento (27 papers)
  5. Alexander Mordvintsev (16 papers)
  6. Andrey Zhmoginov (27 papers)
  7. Max Vladymyrov (18 papers)
Citations (360)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com