Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predicting Properties of Quantum Systems with Conditional Generative Models (2211.16943v3)

Published 30 Nov 2022 in quant-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: Machine learning has emerged recently as a powerful tool for predicting properties of quantum many-body systems. For many ground states of gapped Hamiltonians, generative models can learn from measurements of a single quantum state to reconstruct the state accurately enough to predict local observables. Alternatively, classification and regression models can predict local observables by learning from measurements on different but related states. In this work, we combine the benefits of both approaches and propose the use of conditional generative models to simultaneously represent a family of states, learning shared structures of different quantum states from measurements. The trained model enables us to predict arbitrary local properties of ground states, even for states not included in the training data, without necessitating further training for new observables. We first numerically validate our approach on 2D random Heisenberg models using simulations of up to 45 qubits. Furthermore, we conduct quantum simulations on a neutral-atom quantum computer and demonstrate that our method can accurately predict the quantum phases of square lattices of 13$\times$13 Rydberg atoms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. Scott Aaronson. Shadow tomography of quantum states. SIAM Journal on Computing, 49(5):STOC18–368, 2019.
  2. Quantum state tomography with conditional generative adversarial networks. Physical Review Letters, 127(14):140502, 2021.
  3. Scalable and flexible classical shadow tomography with tensor networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02093, 2022.
  4. Adiabatic quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(1):015002, 2018.
  5. Quantum computer systems for scientific discovery. PRX Quantum, 2(1):017001, 2021.
  6. Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum, 2(1):017003, 2021.
  7. On exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  8. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016.
  9. Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968, 2018.
  10. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature, 551(7682):579–584, 2017.
  11. Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random clifford circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.12924, 2022.
  12. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM review, 59(1):65–98, 2017.
  13. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature, pages 1–3, 2023.
  14. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature, 604(7906):451–456, 2022.
  15. Beweis des adiabatensatzes. Zeitschrift für Physik, 51(3):165–180, 1928.
  16. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  17. Kieron Burke. Perspective on density functional theory. The Journal of chemical physics, 136(15):150901, 2012.
  18. Probabilistic simulation of quantum circuits using a deep-learning architecture. Physical Review A, 104(3):032610, 2021.
  19. Machine learning phases of matter. Nature Physics, 13(5):431–434, 2017.
  20. Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(3):155–161, 2019.
  21. Quantum monte carlo. Science, 231(4738):555–560, 1986.
  22. Attention-based quantum tomography. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3(1):01LT01, 2021.
  23. Quantum tomography. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 128:206–309, 2003.
  24. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  25. Quantum optimization of maximum independent set using rydberg atom arrays. Science, page eabo6587, 2022.
  26. Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator. Nature, 595(7866):227–232, 2021.
  27. The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations. SciPost Phys. Codebases, page 4, 2022.
  28. Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks. Nature communications, 8(1):1–6, 2017.
  29. Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. Physical review letters, 105(15):150401, 2010.
  30. Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  31. Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature, 438(7068):643–646, 2005.
  32. Classical shadow tomography with locally scrambled quantum dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04817, 2021.
  33. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics, 16(10):1050–1057, 2020.
  34. Efficient estimation of pauli observables by derandomization. Physical review letters, 127(3):030503, 2021.
  35. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems. Science, 377(6613):eabk3333, 2022.
  36. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. ICLR, 2015.
  37. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  38. What makes convolutional models great on long sequence modeling? arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09298, 2022.
  39. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021.
  40. SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  41. Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nature physics, 3(2):91–95, 2007.
  42. Autoregressive neural network for simulating open quantum systems via a probabilistic formulation. Physical review letters, 128(9):090501, 2022.
  43. Machine learning discovery of new phases in programmable quantum simulator snapshots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10789, 2021.
  44. Random feature attention. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  45. QuEra Computing Inc. Bloade.jl, 2022.
  46. Learning hard quantum distributions with variational autoencoders. npj Quantum Information, 4(1):1–7, 2018.
  47. Bell states of atoms with ultralong lifetimes and their tomographic state analysis. Physical review letters, 92(22):220402, 2004.
  48. Complex density wave orders and quantum phase transitions in a model of square-lattice rydberg atom arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:103601, Mar 2020.
  49. Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hundreds of rydberg atoms. Nature, 595(7866):233–238, 2021.
  50. Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator. Science, 374(6572):1242–1247, 2021.
  51. Neural kernels without tangents. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8614–8623. PMLR, 2020.
  52. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research, 15(1):1929–1958, 2014.
  53. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nature Physics, 14(5):447–450, 2018.
  54. Integrating neural networks with a quantum simulator for state reconstruction. Physical Review Letters, 123:230504, 2019.
  55. Extrapolating quantum observables with machine learning: Inferring multiple phase transitions from properties of a single phase. Physical review letters, 121(25):255702, 2018.
  56. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  57. K Vogel and H Risken. Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Physical Review A, 40(5):2847, 1989.
  58. Spacetime neural network for high dimensional quantum dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02200, 2021.
  59. Steven R White. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Physical review letters, 69(19):2863, 1992.
  60. Aquila: Quera’s 256-qubit neutral-atom quantum computer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11727, 2023.
  61. Transformer quantum state: A multi-purpose model for quantum many-body problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01758, 2022.
Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com