Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
96 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
51 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
36 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
34 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
96 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
91 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
466 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
148 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Assessment of a cost-effective headphone calibration procedure for soundscape evaluations (2207.12899v1)

Published 24 Jul 2022 in eess.AS and cs.SD

Abstract: To increase the availability and adoption of the soundscape standard, a low-cost calibration procedure for reproduction of audio stimuli over headphones was proposed as part of the global ``Soundscape Attributes Translation Project'' (SATP) for validating ISO/TS~12913-2:2018 perceived affective quality (PAQ) attribute translations. A previous preliminary study revealed significant deviations from the intended equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels ($L_{\text{A,eq}}$) using the open-circuit voltage (OCV) calibration procedure. For a more holistic human-centric perspective, the OCV method is further investigated here in terms of psychoacoustic parameters, including relevant exceedance levels to account for temporal effects on the same 27 stimuli from the SATP. Moreover, a within-subjects experiment with 36 participants was conducted to examine the effects of OCV calibration on the PAQ attributes in ISO/TS~12913-2:2018. Bland-Altman analysis of the objective indicators revealed large biases in the OCV method across all weighted sound level and loudness indicators; and roughness indicators at \SI{5}{\%} and \SI{10}{\%} exceedance levels. Significant perceptual differences due to the OCV method were observed in about \SI{20}{\%} of the stimuli, which did not correspond clearly with the biased acoustic indicators. A cautioned interpretation of the objective and perceptual differences due to small and unpaired samples nevertheless provide grounds for further investigation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Galbrun L, Ali TT. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2013 1;133(1):227–237.
  2. Aletta F, Kang J. Towards an Urban Vibrancy Model: A Soundscape Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018, Vol 15, Page 1712. 2018 8;15(8):1712.
  3. Jeon JY, Lee PJ. Evaluation of urban space as a concept of soundscape. In: Griefahn B, editor. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics Volume 33 Pt.3. ICBEN 2011. London, UK: Institute of Acoustics (IOA); 2011. p. 743–751.
  4. Effects of adding natural sounds to urban noises on the perceived loudness of noise and soundscape quality. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;711.
  5. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12913-1:2014 - Acoustics - Soundscape - Definition and conceptual framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014.
  6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 12913-2:2018 - Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 2: Data collection and reporting requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.
  7. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 12913-3:2019 - Acoustics — Soundscape - Part 3: Data analysis. International Organization for Standardization; 2019.
  8. The effect of sound level on perception of reproduced soundscapes. Applied Acoustics. 2016;110:53–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.03.011.
  9. Auditory salience using natural scenes: An online study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2021;150(4):2952.
  10. Source-specific analysis of the noise in an intensive care unit. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2013; 2013. p. 5186–5194.
  11. Soundscape assessment: Towards a validated translation of perceptual attributes in different languages. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2020; 2020. .
  12. Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise. JASA Express Letters. 2011;129(4):148–153.
  13. Automation of binaural headphone audio calibration on an artificial head. MethodsX. 2021;8(February):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101288.
  14. Perceptual fusion of musical notes by native Amazonians suggests universal representations of musical intervals. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):1–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16448-6.
  15. Preliminary assessment of a cost-effective headphone calibration procedure for soundscape evaluations. arXiv. 2022 5. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.04728.
  16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 12913-2: Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 2: Data collection and reporting requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.
  17. The Soundscape Indices (SSID) Protocol: A Method for Urban Soundscape Surveys—Questionnaires with Acoustical and Contextual Information. Applied Sciences. 2020 4;10(7):2397.
  18. Automation of binaural headphone audio calibration on an artificial head. MethodsX. 2021;8:101288.
  19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-1 Acoustics — Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise — Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2016.
  20. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 532-1:2017 - Acoustics — Method for calculating loudness — Part 1: Zwicker method. vol. 7. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2017.
  21. German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung). DIN 45692 - Measurement technique for the simulation of the auditory sensation of sharpness (In German). August. Berlin, Germany: German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung); 2009.
  22. Ecma International. ECMA-418-2:2020 - Psychoacoustic metrics for ITT equipment - Part 2 (models based on human perception). 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020.
  23. Ecma International. ECMA-74 - Acoustics - Measurement of airborne noise emitted by information technology and telecommunications equipment. 19th ed. Geneva, Switzerland; 2021.
  24. Fastl H, Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models. Huang TS, Schroeder MR, Kohonen T, editors. Springer; 2001.
  25. Crossing the Linguistic Causeway: A Binational Approach for Translating Soundscape Attributes to Bahasa Melayu. arXiv. 2022 6. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.03104.
  26. Available from: https://github.com/kenowr/satp-gui.
  27. Guo B, Yuan Y. A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2017 6;26(3):1323–1340. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0962280215577111.
  28. Henriksen AA. T-test for partially paired data; 2018. Available from: https://gist.github.com/AkselA/9dff13ef662f64188f708c22e0d455ad.
  29. Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986 2;327(8476):307–310. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673686908378.
  30. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
  31. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999 4;8(2):135–160.
Citations (4)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.