Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Faster Exponential-Time Approximation Algorithms Using Approximate Monotone Local Search (2206.13481v1)

Published 27 Jun 2022 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: We generalize the monotone local search approach of Fomin, Gaspers, Lokshtanov and Saurabh [J.ACM 2019], by establishing a connection between parameterized approximation and exponential-time approximation algorithms for monotone subset minimization problems. In a monotone subset minimization problem the input implicitly describes a non-empty set family over a universe of size $n$ which is closed under taking supersets. The task is to find a minimum cardinality set in this family. Broadly speaking, we use approximate monotone local search to show that a parameterized $\alpha$-approximation algorithm that runs in $ck \cdot n{O(1)}$ time, where $k$ is the solution size, can be used to derive an $\alpha$-approximation randomized algorithm that runs in $dn \cdot n{O(1)}$ time, where $d$ is the unique value in $d \in (1,1+\frac{c-1}{\alpha})$ such that $\mathcal{D}(\frac{1}{\alpha}|\frac{d-1}{c-1})=\frac{\ln c}{\alpha}$ and $\mathcal{D}(a |b)$ is the Kullback-Leibler divergence. This running time matches that of Fomin et al. for $\alpha=1$, and is strictly better when $\alpha >1$, for any $c > 1$. Furthermore, we also show that this result can be derandomized at the expense of a sub-exponential multiplicative factor in the running time. We demonstrate the potential of approximate monotone local search by deriving new and faster exponential approximation algorithms for Vertex Cover, $3$-Hitting Set, Directed Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Subset Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Odd Cycle Transversal and Undirected Multicut. For instance, we get a $1.1$-approximation algorithm for Vertex Cover with running time $1.114n \cdot n{O(1)}$, improving upon the previously best known $1.1$-approximation running in time $1.127n \cdot n{O(1)}$ by Bourgeois et al. [DAM 2011].

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.