Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Detecting the Severity of Major Depressive Disorder from Speech: A Novel HARD-Training Methodology (2206.01542v2)

Published 2 Jun 2022 in cs.SD, cs.LG, eess.AS, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common worldwide mental health issue with high associated socioeconomic costs. The prediction and automatic detection of MDD can, therefore, make a huge impact on society. Speech, as a non-invasive, easy to collect signal, is a promising marker to aid the diagnosis and assessment of MDD. In this regard, speech samples were collected as part of the Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD) research programme. RADAR-MDD was an observational cohort study in which speech and other digital biomarkers were collected from a cohort of individuals with a history of MDD in Spain, United Kingdom and the Netherlands. In this paper, the RADAR-MDD speech corpus was taken as an experimental framework to test the efficacy of a Sequence-to-Sequence model with a local attention mechanism in a two-class depression severity classification paradigm. Additionally, a novel training method, HARD-Training, is proposed. It is a methodology based on the selection of more ambiguous samples for the model training, and inspired by the curriculum learning paradigm. HARD-Training was found to consistently improve - with an average increment of 8.6% - the performance of our classifiers for both of two speech elicitation tasks used and each collection site of the RADAR-MDD speech corpus. With this novel methodology, our Sequence-to-Sequence model was able to effectively detect MDD severity regardless of language. Finally, recognising the need for greater awareness of potential algorithmic bias, we conduct an additional analysis of our results separately for each gender.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Edward L. Campbell (2 papers)
  2. Judith Dineley (8 papers)
  3. Pauline Conde (15 papers)
  4. Faith Matcham (12 papers)
  5. Femke Lamers (9 papers)
  6. Sara Siddi (10 papers)
  7. Nicholas Cummins (25 papers)
  8. The RADAR-CNS Consortium (2 papers)
  9. Carmen Garcia-Mateo (25 papers)
  10. Laura Docio-Fernandez (24 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.