Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Federated Stochastic Primal-dual Learning with Differential Privacy (2204.12284v1)

Published 26 Apr 2022 in cs.LG and cs.CR

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a new paradigm that enables many clients to jointly train a ML model under the orchestration of a parameter server while keeping the local data not being exposed to any third party. However, the training of FL is an interactive process between local clients and the parameter server. Such process would cause privacy leakage since adversaries may retrieve sensitive information by analyzing the overheard messages. In this paper, we propose a new federated stochastic primal-dual algorithm with differential privacy (FedSPD-DP). Compared to the existing methods, the proposed FedSPD-DP incorporates local stochastic gradient descent (local SGD) and partial client participation (PCP) for addressing the issues of communication efficiency and straggler effects due to randomly accessed clients. Our analysis shows that the data sampling strategy and PCP can enhance the data privacy whereas the larger number of local SGD steps could increase privacy leakage, revealing a non-trivial tradeoff between algorithm communication efficiency and privacy protection. Specifically, we show that, by guaranteeing $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP for each client per communication round, the proposed algorithm guarantees $(\mathcal{O}(q\epsilon \sqrt{p T}), \delta)$-DP after $T$ communication rounds while maintaining an $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{pTQ})$ convergence rate for a convex and non-smooth learning problem, where $Q$ is the number of local SGD steps, $p$ is the client sampling probability, $q=\max_{i} q_i/\sqrt{1-q_i}$ and $q_i$ is the data sampling probability of each client under PCP. Experiment results are presented to evaluate the practical performance of the proposed algorithm and comparison with state-of-the-art methods.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Yiwei Li (107 papers)
  2. Shuai Wang (466 papers)
  3. Tsung-Hui Chang (86 papers)
  4. Chong-Yung Chi (25 papers)
Citations (7)