Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training (2201.10005v1)

Published 24 Jan 2022 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: Text embeddings are useful features in many applications such as semantic search and computing text similarity. Previous work typically trains models customized for different use cases, varying in dataset choice, training objective and model architecture. In this work, we show that contrastive pre-training on unsupervised data at scale leads to high quality vector representations of text and code. The same unsupervised text embeddings that achieve new state-of-the-art results in linear-probe classification also display impressive semantic search capabilities and sometimes even perform competitively with fine-tuned models. On linear-probe classification accuracy averaging over 7 tasks, our best unsupervised model achieves a relative improvement of 4% and 1.8% over previous best unsupervised and supervised text embedding models respectively. The same text embeddings when evaluated on large-scale semantic search attains a relative improvement of 23.4%, 14.7%, and 10.6% over previous best unsupervised methods on MSMARCO, Natural Questions and TriviaQA benchmarks, respectively. Similarly to text embeddings, we train code embedding models on (text, code) pairs, obtaining a 20.8% relative improvement over prior best work on code search.

Overview of "Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training"

The research paper, "Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training," proposes an innovative approach to learning high-quality vector representations for both text and code by employing contrastive pre-training on extensive unsupervised datasets. This method is designed to be effective across multiple applications, including semantic search and text similarity computations, which historically necessitated customized models.

Methodology and Architecture

The authors train embedding models using a contrastive learning objective. The models are based on Transformer encoder architectures, leveraging paired data for training without the requirement of explicit labels. For text embeddings, the paper utilizes paired text snippets from the internet as positive pairs, while for code embeddings, docstrings and their corresponding function implementations serve this role.

Initialization is done with pre-trained generative models, such as GPT and Codex, to augment the efficacy of the embeddings. A critical element in their methodology is the use of large batch sizes, enabling the models to effectively utilize in-batch negatives and enhance performance significantly.

Results and Performance

The paper's results indicate a marked improvement over prior methods in several key areas:

  • Text Classification: The contrastive pre-trained text models achieve notable performance in linear-probe classification tasks, with a relative improvement of 1.8% over previous best supervised models.
  • Semantic Search: The approach shows strong capabilities in large-scale semantic search, outperforming previous unsupervised methods by 23.4% on the MSMARCO benchmark and showing competitive results even against some fine-tuned models on the TriviaQA dataset.
  • Code Search: The code embeddings demonstrate a 20.8% improvement over prior results on the CodeSearchNet benchmark, establishing state-of-the-art performance for natural language queries against code repositories.

Interestingly, the paper finds that text embeddings, while underperforming on sentence similarity tasks, excel in search and classification applications that are often associated with tangible implementations.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are multifaceted. Practically, the ability to use a single unsupervised model across varying tasks can streamline the implementation of text retrieval systems and enhance information retrieval efficiency. Theoretically, the research challenges the necessity for dataset-specific models, suggesting a universal approach could bridge different domains.

Looking to the future, the research suggests avenues for further exploration, particularly in addressing the gap in performance on sentence similarity tasks. Additionally, the intersection of embedding techniques with ethical AI raises questions about biases encoded within models, emphasizing the need for scrutiny and enhancements in evaluation methodologies.

Conclusion

The work presented in this paper contributes significant insights into the potential of contrastive learning to produce versatile and high-performing embeddings applicable to both text and code streams. It prominently suggests that by scaling batch sizes and leveraging pre-existing generative models, considerable advancements in semantic representation can be achieved, establishing a foundation for future exploration and application development in AI and machine learning.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (25)
  1. Arvind Neelakantan (20 papers)
  2. Tao Xu (133 papers)
  3. Raul Puri (12 papers)
  4. Alec Radford (22 papers)
  5. Jesse Michael Han (11 papers)
  6. Jerry Tworek (7 papers)
  7. Qiming Yuan (6 papers)
  8. Nikolas Tezak (14 papers)
  9. Jong Wook Kim (17 papers)
  10. Chris Hallacy (4 papers)
  11. Johannes Heidecke (13 papers)
  12. Pranav Shyam (12 papers)
  13. Boris Power (2 papers)
  14. Tyna Eloundou Nekoul (1 paper)
  15. Girish Sastry (11 papers)
  16. Gretchen Krueger (11 papers)
  17. David Schnurr (4 papers)
  18. Felipe Petroski Such (14 papers)
  19. Kenny Hsu (2 papers)
  20. Madeleine Thompson (1 paper)
Citations (361)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com