Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Fixed-point cycles and EFX allocations (2201.08753v1)

Published 21 Jan 2022 in cs.DS and math.CO

Abstract: We study edge-labelings of the complete bidirected graph $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ with functions from the set $[d] = {1, \dots, d}$ to itself. We call a cycle in $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ a fixed-point cycle if composing the labels of its edges results in a map that has a fixed point, and we say that a labeling is fixed-point-free if no fixed-point cycle exists. For a given $d$, we ask for the largest value of $n$, denoted $R_f(d)$, for which there exists a fixed-point-free labeling of $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$. Determining $R_f(d)$ for all $d >0$ is a natural Ramsey-type question, generalizing some well-studied zero-sum problems in extremal combinatorics. The problem was recently introduced by Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra, who proved that $d \leq R_f(d) \leq d4+d$ and showed that the problem has close connections to EFX allocations, a central problem of fair allocation in social choice theory. In this paper we show the improved bound $R_f(d) \leq d{2 + o(1)}$, yielding an efficient ${{(1-\varepsilon)}}$-EFX allocation with $n$ agents and $O(n{0.67})$ unallocated goods for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1/2]$; this improves the bound of $O(n{0.8})$ of Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra. Additionally, we prove the stronger upper bound $2d-2$, in the case where all edge-labels are permulations. A very special case of this problem, that of finding zero-sum cycles in digraphs whose edges are labeled with elements of $\mathbb{Z}_d$, was recently considered by Alon and Krivelevich and by M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros and Steiner. Our result improves the bounds obtained by these authors and extends them to labelings from an arbitrary (not necessarily commutative) group, while also simplifying the proof.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.