Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Long paths make pattern-counting hard, and deep trees make it harder (2111.03479v1)

Published 5 Nov 2021 in cs.CC and cs.DM

Abstract: We study the counting problem known as #PPM, whose input is a pair of permutations $\pi$ and $\tau$ (called pattern and text, respectively), and the task is to find the number of subsequences of $\tau$ that have the same relative order as $\pi$. A simple brute-force approach solves #PPM for a pattern of length $k$ and a text of length $n$ in time $O(n{k+1})$, while Berendsohn, Kozma and Marx have recently shown that under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), it cannot be solved in time $f(k) n{o(k/\log k)}$ for any function $f$. In this paper, we consider the restriction of #PPM, known as $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM, where the pattern $\pi$ must belong to a hereditary permutation class $\mathcal{C}$. Our goal is to identify the structural properties of $\mathcal{C}$ that determine the complexity of $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM. We focus on two such structural properties, known as the long path property (LPP) and the deep tree property (DTP). Assuming ETH, we obtain these results: 1. If $C$ has the LPP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM cannot be solved in time $f(k)n{o(\sqrt{k})}$ for any function $f$, and 2. if $C$ has the DTP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM cannot be solved in time $f(k)n{o(k/\log2 k)}$ for any function $f$. Furthermore, when $\mathcal{C}$ is one of the so-called monotone grid classes, we show that if $\mathcal{C}$ has the LPP but not the DTP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM can be solved in time $f(k)n{O(\sqrt k)}$. In particular, the lower bounds above are tight up to the polylog terms in the exponents.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.