Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Delay-aware Robust Control for Safe Autonomous Driving (2109.07101v3)

Published 15 Sep 2021 in cs.RO

Abstract: With the advancement of affordable self-driving vehicles using complicated nonlinear optimization but limited computation resources, computation time becomes a matter of concern. Other factors such as actuator dynamics and actuator command processing cost also unavoidably cause delays. In high-speed scenarios, these delays are critical to the safety of a vehicle. Recent works consider these delays individually, but none unifies them all in the context of autonomous driving. Moreover, recent works inappropriately consider computation time as a constant or a large upper bound, which makes the control either less responsive or over-conservative. To deal with all these delays, we present a unified framework by 1) modeling actuation dynamics, 2) using robust tube model predictive control, 3) using a novel adaptive Kalman filter without assuminga known process model and noise covariance, which makes the controller safe while minimizing conservativeness. On onehand, our approach can serve as a standalone controller; on theother hand, our approach provides a safety guard for a high-level controller, which assumes no delay. This can be used for compensating the sim-to-real gap when deploying a black-box learning-enabled controller trained in a simplistic environment without considering delays for practical vehicle systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. P. Cortes, J. Rodriguez, C. Silva, and A. Flores, “Delay compensation in model predictive current control of a three-phase inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, pp. 1323–1325, 2011.
  2. Y. Su, K. K. Tan, and T. H. Lee, “Computation delay compensation for real time implementation of robust model predictive control,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1342–1349, 2013.
  3. A. Nahidi, A. Khajepour, A. Kasaeizadeh, S.-K. Chen, and B. Litkouhi, “A study on actuator delay compensation using predictive control technique with experimental verification,” Mechatronics, vol. 57, pp. 140–149, 2019.
  4. Y. Liao and F. Liao, “Design of preview controller for linear continuous-time systems with input delay,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1080–1090, 2018.
  5. N. E. Kahveci and P. A. Ioannou, “Automatic steering of vehicles subject to actuator saturation and delay,” in 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011, pp. 119–124.
  6. R. Smith, “Robust model predictive control of constrained linear systems,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, vol. 1, 2004, pp. 245–250 vol.1.
  7. Y. Gao, A. Gray, H. E. Tseng, and F. Borrelli, “A tube-based robust nonlinear predictive control approach to semiautonomous ground vehicles,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 802–823, 2014.
  8. S. Khaitan, Q. Lin, and J. M. Dolan, “Safe planning and control under uncertainty for self-driving,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 9826–9837, 2021.
  9. C. Liu and M. Tomizuka, “Safe exploration: Addressing various uncertainty levels in human robot interactions,” in 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).   IEEE, 2015, pp. 465–470.
  10. I. Hashlamon and K. Erbatur, “An improved real-time adaptive kalman filter with recursive noise covariance updating rules,” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 12 2013.
  11. K. Myers and B. Tapley, “Adaptive sequential estimation with unknown noise statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 520–523, 1976.
  12. A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier functions: Theory and applications,” in 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 3420–3431.
  13. D. Dolgov, S. Thrun, M. Montemerlo, and J. Diebel, “Practical search techniques in path planning for autonomous driving,” Ann Arbor, vol. 1001, no. 48105, pp. 18–80, 2008.
  14. M. Werling, J. Ziegler, S. Kammel, and S. Thrun, “Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a frenet frame,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.   IEEE, 2010.
  15. Ansys corporation, “Vrxperience driving simulator.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ansys.com/en-in/products/av-simulation/ansys-vrxperience-driving-simulator
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.