Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The missing link: Developing a safety case for perception components in automated driving (2108.13294v4)

Published 30 Aug 2021 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.RO, cs.SE, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Safety assurance is a central concern for the development and societal acceptance of automated driving (AD) systems. Perception is a key aspect of AD that relies heavily on Machine Learning (ML). Despite the known challenges with the safety assurance of ML-based components, proposals have recently emerged for unit-level safety cases addressing these components. Unfortunately, AD safety cases express safety requirements at the system level and these efforts are missing the critical linking argument needed to integrate safety requirements at the system level with component performance requirements at the unit level. In this paper, we propose the Integration Safety Case for Perception (ISCaP), a generic template for such a linking safety argument specifically tailored for perception components. The template takes a deductive and formal approach to define strong traceability between levels. We demonstrate the applicability of ISCaP with a detailed case study and discuss its use as a tool to support incremental development of perception components.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Rick Salay (17 papers)
  2. Krzysztof Czarnecki (65 papers)
  3. Hiroshi Kuwajima (7 papers)
  4. Hirotoshi Yasuoka (10 papers)
  5. Toshihiro Nakae (3 papers)
  6. Vahdat Abdelzad (12 papers)
  7. Chengjie Huang (11 papers)
  8. Maximilian Kahn (2 papers)
  9. Van Duong Nguyen (2 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.