Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Griddings of permutations and hardness of pattern matching (2107.10897v2)

Published 22 Jul 2021 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: We study the complexity of the decision problem known as Permutation Pattern Matching, or PPM. The input of PPM consists of a pair of permutations $\tau$ (the text') and $\pi$ (thepattern'), and the goal is to decide whether $\tau$ contains $\pi$ as a subpermutation. On general inputs, PPM is known to be NP-complete by a result of Bose, Buss and Lubiw. In this paper, we focus on restricted instances of PPM where the text is assumed to avoid a fixed (small) pattern $\sigma$; this restriction is known as Av($\sigma$)-PPM. It has been previously shown that Av($\sigma$)-PPM is polynomial for any $\sigma$ of size at most 3, while it is NP-hard for any $\sigma$ containing a monotone subsequence of length four. In this paper, we present a new hardness reduction which allows us to show, in a uniform way, that Av($\sigma$)-PPM is hard for every $\sigma$ of size at least 6, for every $\sigma$ of size 5 except the symmetry class of $41352$, as well as for every $\sigma$ symmetric to one of the three permutations $4321$, $4312$ and $4231$. Moreover, assuming the exponential time hypothesis, none of these hard cases of Av($\sigma$)-PPM can be solved in time $2{o(n/\log n)}$. Previously, such conditional lower bound was not known even for the unconstrained PPM problem. On the tractability side, we combine the CSP approach of Guillemot and Marx with the structural results of Huczynska and Vatter to show that for any monotone-griddable permutation class C, PPM is polynomial when the text is restricted to a permutation from C.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.