Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Training Software Engineers for Qualitative Evaluation of Software Architecture (2105.09595v1)

Published 20 May 2021 in cs.SE

Abstract: A software architect uses quality requirements to design the architecture of a system. However, it is essential to ensure that the system's final architectural design achieves the standard quality requirements. The existing architectural evaluation frameworks require basic skills and experience for practical usage, which novice software architects lack. We propose a framework that enables novice software architects to infer the system's quality requirements and tactics using the software architectural block-line diagram. The framework takes an image as input, extracts various components and connections, and maps them to viable architectural patterns, followed by identifying the system's corresponding quality attributes (QAs) and tactics. The framework includes a specifically trained machine learning model based on image processing and semantic similarity methods to assist software architects in evaluating a given design by a) evaluating an input architectural design based on the architectural patterns present in it, b) lists out the strengths and weaknesses of the design in terms of QAs, c) recommends the necessary architectural tactics that can be embedded in the design to achieve the lacking QAs. To train our framework, we developed a dataset of 2,035 architectural images from fourteen architectural patterns such as Client-Server, Microservices, and Model View Controller, available at https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14156408. The framework achieves a Correct Recognition Rate of 98.71% in identifying the architectural patterns. We evaluated the proposed framework's effectiveness and usefulness by using controlled and experimental groups, in which the experimental group performed approximately 150% better than the controlled group. The experiments were performed as a part of the Masters of Computer Science course in an Engineering Institution.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Ritu Kapur (6 papers)
  2. Sumit Kalra (1 paper)
  3. Kamlesh Tiwari (11 papers)
  4. Geetika Arora (3 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.