Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Simultaneous Assignment Problem (2105.09439v3)

Published 20 May 2021 in cs.DS and math.OC

Abstract: This paper introduces the Simultaneous assignment problem. Let us given a graph with a weight and a capacity function on its edges, and a set of its subgraphs along with a degree upper bound function for each of them. We are also given a laminar system on the node set with an upper bound on the degree-sum in each member of the system. Our goal is to assign each edge a non-negative integer below its capacity such that the total weight is maximized, the degrees in each subgraph are below the associated degree upper bound, and the degree-sum bound is respected in each member of the laminar system. We identify special cases when the problem is solvable in polynomial time. One of these cases is a common generalization of the hierarchical $b$-matching problem and the laminar matchoid problem. This implies that both problems can be solved efficiently in the weighted, capacitated case even if both lower and upper bounds are present -- generalizing the previous polynomial-time algorithms. The problem is solvable for trees provided that the laminar system is empty and a natural assumption holds for the subgraphs. The general problem, however, is shown to be APX-hard in the unweighted case, which implies that the $d$-distance matching problem is APX-hard. Furthermore, we prove that the approximation guarantee of any polynomial-time algorithm must increase linearly in the number of the given subgraphs unless P=NP. We give a generic framework for deriving approximation algorithms, which can be applied to a wide range of problems. As an application to our problem, a constant-approximation algorithm is derived when the number of the subgraphs is a constant. The approximation guarantee is the same as the integrality gap of a strengthened LP-relaxation when the number of the subgraphs is small. Improved approximation algorithms are given when the degree bounds are uniform or the graph is sparse.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.