Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
89 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
41 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
23 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
19 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
96 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
88 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
467 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
197 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Critical Study of Howell et al.'s Nonlinear Beam Theory (2012.13351v3)

Published 23 Dec 2020 in physics.class-ph

Abstract: In our analysis, we show that Howell et al.'s nonlinear beam theory does not depict a representation of the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation, nonlinear or otherwise. The authors' nonlinear beam theory implies that one can bend a beam in to a constant radius of deformation and maintain that constant radius of deformation with zero force. Thus, the model is disproven by showing that it is invalid when the curvature of deformation is constant, while even the linear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation stays perfectly valid under such deformations. To conclude, we derive a nonlinear beam equation by using Ciarlet's nonlinear plate equations and show that our model is valid for constant radius of deformations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube