Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

One-class Learning Towards Synthetic Voice Spoofing Detection (2010.13995v2)

Published 27 Oct 2020 in eess.AS and cs.SD

Abstract: Human voices can be used to authenticate the identity of the speaker, but the automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems are vulnerable to voice spoofing attacks, such as impersonation, replay, text-to-speech, and voice conversion. Recently, researchers developed anti-spoofing techniques to improve the reliability of ASV systems against spoofing attacks. However, most methods encounter difficulties in detecting unknown attacks in practical use, which often have different statistical distributions from known attacks. Especially, the fast development of synthetic voice spoofing algorithms is generating increasingly powerful attacks, putting the ASV systems at risk of unseen attacks. In this work, we propose an anti-spoofing system to detect unknown synthetic voice spoofing attacks (i.e., text-to-speech or voice conversion) using one-class learning. The key idea is to compact the bona fide speech representation and inject an angular margin to separate the spoofing attacks in the embedding space. Without resorting to any data augmentation methods, our proposed system achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 2.19% on the evaluation set of ASVspoof 2019 Challenge logical access scenario, outperforming all existing single systems (i.e., those without model ensemble).

Citations (199)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a one-class classification method that effectively distinguishes synthetic voice attacks from genuine speech signals.
  • It employs comprehensive feature extraction and robust anomaly detection techniques to enhance detection reliability.
  • Experimental results show that the approach significantly reduces false acceptance rates in challenging spoofing scenarios.

Overview of IEEE Signal Processing Letters Manuscript Guidelines

The paper "Preparation of Papers for IEEE Signal Processing Letters" provides prospective authors with comprehensive instructions for preparing manuscripts intended for submission to IEEE Signal Processing Letters. As an esteemed publication, IEEE has established specific formatting and submission criteria to ensure clarity, consistency, and quality in its presentations. This document serves as an essential guide, primarily focusing on stylistic and procedural requirements for manuscript authors.

Key Elements of Manuscript Preparation

The document outlines the importance of adherence to the constraints on article length and format. Articles are strictly limited to four pages, with an additional page permitted exclusively for references. This reflects the journal's emphasis on brevity and succinctness, ensuring that contributions are sharp and focused. The authors emphasize that non-essential elements like biographies and photos are not permissible, reinforcing the journal's commitment to content over supplementary material.

Graphics and visual data representation details are exhaustively outlined, highlighting acceptable types of graphics (e.g., color, grayscale figures, line art). Specific guidelines on file formats are articulated, mandating authors to save figures in formats such as .EPS or .TIFF, ensuring high-resolution submissions, and prescribing the correct use of Open Type fonts. Multiparty figures must conform to the strictest applicable category guidelines, underlining IEEE's rigorous standards for visual data integrity.

Figure and table placement within the manuscript is flexible; however, captions must be separately positioned. This flexibility facilitates the final layout process managed by IEEE, which takes responsibility for the ultimate article formatting.

Structural and Technical Specifications

The paper further discusses vector art preparation, encouraging authors to supply scalable formats (.EPS/.PDF/.PS) with all fonts embedded to preserve formatting consistency across different viewing platforms. The authors specify recommended fonts to avoid text distortion—a technical detail crucial for preserving the professional appearance of the manuscript.

Moreover, the IEEE Graphics Analyzer is introduced as a tool for authors to verify their figures' compliance against IEEE standards pre-submission. This quality control step is crucial for adherence to dimensions, formatting, and naming conventions—factors that can impact the acceptance of a manuscript significantly.

Citing and Referencing Protocols

The paper prescribes detailed instructions for citing references and footnotes, adhering to IEEE style guidelines. This includes the order and presentation of author names, work titles, publication sources, and other bibliographic elements. The recommendations on referencing articulations ensure uniformity and facilitate peer verification and reproducibility of the cited works, highlighting the IEEE's insistence on academic rigor and traceability.

Implications and Future Developments

While this paper provides a fundamental guideline for manuscript preparation, it implicitly sets a standard reflective of broader academic publishing practices. The rigor imposed through these instructions helps maintain the high scholarly standards IEEE is known for and impacts the perceived professionalism and accessibility of publications across the discipline.

In the context of future developments, increased adoption of automated formatting and analysis tools could streamline the submission process further, enhance author experience, and potentially simplify compliance verification. Advanced AI-driven tools may also assist in the quality assessment of graphics and format consistency, offering more intuitive support to authors navigating the comprehensive requirements of submission.

Overall, the paper demonstrates meticulous attention to detail, reflective of the broader ecosystem of academic publishing, underlining the need for authors to master the procedural aspects as diligently as their technical content.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com