Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

BioMegatron: Larger Biomedical Domain Language Model (2010.06060v2)

Published 12 Oct 2020 in cs.CL

Abstract: There has been an influx of biomedical domain-specific LLMs, showing LLMs pre-trained on biomedical text perform better on biomedical domain benchmarks than those trained on general domain text corpora such as Wikipedia and Books. Yet, most works do not study the factors affecting each domain language application deeply. Additionally, the study of model size on domain-specific models has been mostly missing. We empirically study and evaluate several factors that can affect performance on domain language applications, such as the sub-word vocabulary set, model size, pre-training corpus, and domain transfer. We show consistent improvements on benchmarks with our larger BioMegatron model trained on a larger domain corpus, contributing to our understanding of domain LLM applications. We demonstrate noticeable improvements over the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) on standard biomedical NLP benchmarks of named entity recognition, relation extraction, and question answering. Model checkpoints and code are available at [https://ngc.nvidia.com] and [https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo].

BioMegatron: Larger Biomedical Domain LLM

The paper "BioMegatron: Larger Biomedical Domain LLM" presents an insightful exploration of LLMs tailored for the biomedical domain. Recognizing the unique challenges and opportunities in biomedical NLP, this research investigates the underexplored aspects of model size and domain-specific pre-training.

Key Contributions

This paper builds upon the successes of domain-specific transformers, such as BioBERT and SciBERT. However, while previous works primarily focused on leveraging existing architectures with domain-specific data, this paper delves deeper into the interplay between sub-word vocabulary, model size, pre-training corpora, and domain transfer.

Model Variants and Configurations:

  1. BioMegatron Models:
    • The authors developed three sizes of the BioMegatron model, with parameter counts of 345 million, 800 million, and 1.2 billion.
    • The models were pre-trained using the Megatron-LM framework, known for efficiently training LLMs.
  2. Pre-training Corpus:
    • Utilized a corpus comprising 4.5 billion PubMed abstracts and the 1.6 billion-word PMC full-text corpus.
    • Different configurations were tested: cased and uncased BERT vocabularies, and domain-specific vocabularies with 30k and 50k subword units.

Evaluation and Results

The paper details extensive evaluations on standard biomedical NLP benchmarks, including Named Entity Recognition (NER), Relation Extraction (RE), and Question Answering (QA).

  • NER Performance: The results showed that subword vocabulary significantly affects NER tasks. BioMegatron's vocabulary setup provided notable improvements in F1 scores.
  • RE Performance: Model scalability positively impacted RE task performance, highlighting the importance of considering both vocabulary and model size.
  • QA Performance: Larger model sizes provided better results, though marginal gains were noted beyond a certain threshold.

Noticeably, BioMegatron demonstrated improvements over existing state-of-the-art models in several benchmarks, providing evidence for the advantages of model scalability and biomedical-specific vocabularies.

Implications and Future Directions

This research offers several implications and potential future work avenues in the field of AI and NLP:

  1. Domain-Specific Optimization: It suggests that domain-specific vocabulary and tailored model configurations are critical for achieving superior performance in specialized areas like biomedical NLP.
  2. Scalability Considerations: While larger models generally perform better, the paper highlights that the relationship between model size and performance is complex, especially for domain-specific tasks.
  3. Cross-Domain Generalization: Findings indicate that domain-specific models might be less versatile across different domains. Future studies could investigate cost-effective ways to enhance cross-domain efficacy without compromising domain-specific performance.

This work advances the understanding of NLP in specialized domains, reinforcing the necessity for carefully designed LLMs that cater to the nuances of the target corpus. The insights gleaned suggest productive directions for continued enhancement of AI capabilities in the biomedical field, contributing meaningfully to both theoretical knowledge and practical applications.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Hoo-Chang Shin (17 papers)
  2. Yang Zhang (1129 papers)
  3. Evelina Bakhturina (21 papers)
  4. Raul Puri (12 papers)
  5. Mostofa Patwary (34 papers)
  6. Mohammad Shoeybi (60 papers)
  7. Raghav Mani (1 paper)
Citations (133)