Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models (2010.02502v4)

Published 6 Oct 2020 in cs.LG and cs.CV

Abstract: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) have achieved high quality image generation without adversarial training, yet they require simulating a Markov chain for many steps to produce a sample. To accelerate sampling, we present denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIMs), a more efficient class of iterative implicit probabilistic models with the same training procedure as DDPMs. In DDPMs, the generative process is defined as the reverse of a Markovian diffusion process. We construct a class of non-Markovian diffusion processes that lead to the same training objective, but whose reverse process can be much faster to sample from. We empirically demonstrate that DDIMs can produce high quality samples $10 \times$ to $50 \times$ faster in terms of wall-clock time compared to DDPMs, allow us to trade off computation for sample quality, and can perform semantically meaningful image interpolation directly in the latent space.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Jiaming Song (78 papers)
  2. Chenlin Meng (39 papers)
  3. Stefano Ermon (279 papers)
Citations (5,400)

Summary

Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models: An Expert Review

The paper "Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models" introduces an innovative class of generative models termed as Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models (DDIMs). This work targets the inefficiency problem of denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) by proposing a more efficient alternative that maintains high sample quality while significantly reducing computational overhead.

Core Contributions

  1. Generalization of DDPMs: The authors generalize DDPMs by considering non-Markovian diffusion processes. This generalization leads to a new iterative model that preserves the training objectives of DDPMs but adapts sampling methodologies for efficiency.
  2. Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models (DDIMs): A novel class of models is introduced where the generative process does not necessitate adversarial training. DDIMs leverage deterministic processes, which allow faster sample generation while retaining high-quality outputs.
  3. Efficiency and Quality: Empirical results demonstrate that DDIMs can generate high-quality samples 10 to 50 times faster than DDPMs. This efficiency is achieved through fewer sampling steps without a significant loss of sample integrity.
  4. Flexible Training Objective: The paper highlights that a shared surrogate objective across different diffusion processes allows the same neural network to be reused. The implication is that various generative and sampling methods can be employed interchangeably.

Numerical Results

The numerical experiments presented in the paper underscore several advantages of the DDIM framework:

  • Sample Quality: In terms of Frechet Inception Distance (FID), DDIMs consistently outperform DDPMs when fewer steps are considered. For instance, on the CIFAR-10 dataset, DDIM achieves an FID of 13.36 with only 10 steps, while DDPM with the same number of steps scores 41.07.
  • Consistency in Features: The DDIM framework maintains high-level features of generated images consistent across different step counts. This property is crucial for semantic interpolations directly from the latent space.
  • Time Efficiency: On a Nvidia 2080 Ti GPU, generating 50k 32×3232 \times 32 images takes approximately 20 hours with DDPMs, while DDIMs can achieve similar results in a fraction of the time (~2 hours for 100 steps or even faster for fewer steps).

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretical:

  • Surrogate Objective Justification: The equivalence between different variational objectives when optimally trained suggests a robust theoretical underpinning for using non-Markovian processes.
  • Link to Neural ODEs: The paper draws a connection between DDIMs and neural ordinary differential equations (Neural ODEs), highlighting similarity in the Euler integration steps for both models. This insight opens up possibilities for leveraging deeper mathematical tools from ODE theory to possibly enhance DDIMs further.

Practical:

  • Sampling Efficiency: This research bridges the efficiency gap between GANs and diffusion models, making DDIMs suitable for practical applications where rapid sampling is imperative.
  • Scalability: By accommodating different sampling step counts, DDIMs provide flexibility for both small-scale and large-scale image generation tasks.

Future Developments

Several avenues for future research emerge from this work:

  • Alternative Forward Processes: Exploring continuous or alternative combinatorial forward processes could pave the way for even more efficient generative models.
  • Advanced Integration Methods: Techniques from numerical methods literature, such as multi-step methods or adaptive integration techniques, could enhance the performance of DDIMs.
  • Broader Applications: Extending DDIMs beyond image generation to other domains like audio synthesis, natural language processing, and scientific data simulation could be fruitful.

Conclusion

The introduction of Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models marks a significant advancement in the field of generative models. By generalizing the forward process in DDPMs to non-Markovian models, DDIMs offer a substantial leap in efficiency without compromising sample quality. The seamless integration of DDIMs with existing training frameworks and their ability to generate samples quickly makes them a valuable addition to the generative modeling toolkit. Future research can further refine these models, leveraging their inherent theoretical strengths and practical versatility.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com