Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
96 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
44 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
18 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
24 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
105 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
83 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
462 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
254 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systems (2007.13019v1)

Published 25 Jul 2020 in cs.IR

Abstract: Recommendation algorithms are known to suffer from popularity bias; a few popular items are recommended frequently while the majority of other items are ignored. These recommendations are then consumed by the users, their reaction will be logged and added to the system: what is generally known as a feedback loop. In this paper, we propose a method for simulating the users interaction with the recommenders in an offline setting and study the impact of feedback loop on the popularity bias amplification of several recommendation algorithms. We then show how this bias amplification leads to several other problems such as declining the aggregate diversity, shifting the representation of users' taste over time and also homogenization of the users experience. In particular, we show that the impact of feedback loop is generally stronger for the users who belong to the minority group.

Citations (229)

Summary

  • The paper reveals that recommender feedback loops significantly intensify popularity bias and reduce aggregate diversity.
  • The authors simulate user interactions with models like UserKNN, BPR, and MostPopular to analyze the dynamic evolution of recommendations.
  • Empirical results show that bias amplification leads to homogenized experiences and misrepresentation of minority user preferences.

Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systems: An Analytical Perspective

The paper "Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systems" presents a comprehensive analysis of how recommender algorithms exacerbate existing biases through a feedback loop mechanism. The paper focuses on the amplification of popularity bias within these systems and the subsequent impacts on aggregate diversity, user preference representation, and user experience homogenization. By simulating user interactions in an offline framework, the authors demonstrate the effects of recommender feedback loops on bias propagation, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of recommender systems.

Methodology and Findings

At the core of this paper is the challenge of popularity bias in collaborative filtering systems, wherein a small number of popular items disproportionately dominate recommendation outputs. These tend to lead to a concentration effect, where the majority of items receive little to no attention. The authors introduce a method for simulating user interactions with recommendation algorithms—specifically, UserKNN, Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR), and a MostPopular model—to assess how repeated iterations of biased recommendations influence system outputs.

The feedback loop is observed through a simulated cycle of generating recommendation lists and updating user profiles based on user-item interactions, allowing the authors to model the dynamic evolution of user profiles and recommendation quality over time. The paper’s primary findings suggest that feedback loops significantly intensify popularity bias across all tested algorithms, with BPR demonstrating the most pronounced bias propagation. This intensification results in reduced aggregate diversity of recommended items, further amplifying dominant trends while stifling niche item exposure.

Implications of Bias Amplification

The paper thoroughly investigates the downstream consequences of amplified bias. A primary concern is the "homogenization" of user experiences, where diverse user tastes converge due to biased recommendations. Empirical results illustrate this effect, especially for minority groups, exemplified by gender-based analysis using the MovieLens dataset. Female users, representing a minority demographic in the dataset, exhibit more severe deviations in taste profiles compared to males, aligning their expressed preferences more closely with that of the majority.

Moreover, the shifting representation of user preferences introduces potential inaccuracies in capturing authentic user tastes, misaligning system predictions with actual user interests over time. This phenomenon underscores the need for algorithms that can dynamically adjust to preserve user engagement without compromising content exploration and serendipity.

Future Directions and Considerations

The research posits several avenues for future work, emphasizing the necessity of algorithmic interventions to counteract bias amplification. Strategies that might maintain or enhance diversity within recommendations while minimizing feedback loop effects are particularly crucial. The paper suggests pursuing real-world implementations of multi-stakeholder frameworks and diversity-aware algorithms to mitigate the identified risks.

The authors also highlight potential improvements in user interaction models, proposing alternative grouping strategies and selection policies. These enhancements could yield higher fidelity simulations of real-world user feedback, offering richer insights into the systemic behavioral patterns of recommender systems.

Conclusion

This analysis of feedback loops in recommender systems presents compelling evidence of the critical impact of bias amplification. As the demand for personalized content delivery systems grows, recognizing and addressing these challenges through sophisticated design and evaluative methodologies remains a priority. The paper's findings serve as a clarion call for more nuanced investigatory approaches and innovative solution development in the recommender system domain, ensuring comprehensive, equitable, and effective recommendations for all user segments.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube