Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow Prediction (2007.04439v3)

Published 8 Jul 2020 in cs.LG, physics.comp-ph, and stat.ML

Abstract: Solving large complex partial differential equations (PDEs), such as those that arise in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), is a computationally expensive process. This has motivated the use of deep learning approaches to approximate the PDE solutions, yet the simulation results predicted from these approaches typically do not generalize well to truly novel scenarios. In this work, we develop a hybrid (graph) neural network that combines a traditional graph convolutional network with an embedded differentiable fluid dynamics simulator inside the network itself. By combining an actual CFD simulator (run on a much coarser resolution representation of the problem) with the graph network, we show that we can both generalize well to new situations and benefit from the substantial speedup of neural network CFD predictions, while also substantially outperforming the coarse CFD simulation alone.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
Citations (207)

Summary

Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow Prediction

The paper addresses the challenge of predicting fluid dynamics by integrating differentiable partial differential equation (PDE) solvers with graph neural networks (GNNs). The authors propose a hybrid model, termed CFD-GCN, combining the computational efficiency of graph convolutional networks (GCNs) and the physical accuracy of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulator. This work aims to enhance prediction accuracy over existing deep learning approaches to simulate fluid flow, notably the nonlinear Navier-Stokes equations, integral to computational fluid dynamics.

The computational expense of solving large PDEs has motivated the exploration of deep learning models to approximate solutions. However, these models often lack robust generalization across diverse scenarios. Indeed, accurately capturing fluid behavior over varying conditions remains a formidable task, primarily when operating under the constrained scenarios encountered in aerodynamic design.

Methodology

The proposed CFD-GCN model comprises two core components: a GCN that directly utilizes the non-uniform mesh typical in CFD tasks and a differentiable CFD solver embedded within the network. The GCN is critical for handling unstructured meshes, an improvement over previous methodologies that used structured grids more suited to convolutional networks. The embedded CFD solver operates on a coarser mesh, providing a speed advantage due to reduced computational requirements. Importantly, the solver is treated as a network layer within a PyTorch architecture, enabling gradient-based optimization of both the mesh and the network itself using adjoint methods.

The network utilizes a dual-graph framework, with the coarse mesh informing the CFD simulation and a fine mesh guiding the GCN's spatial processing of simulation parameters, such as the Angle of Attack (AoA) and Mach number, which determine the flow conditions.

Numerical Results and Generalization

The authors validate the CFD-GCN model through experiments testing both interpolation within the training domain and generalization to novel conditions. Results indicated superior performance by the hybrid model over simplified CFD simulations and pure learning-based approaches. Notably, in scenarios with significant parameter divergence from training data, such as shock formation—a nonlinear flow feature often absent from training—the CFD-GCN demonstrated improved generalization. This suggests its increased efficacy in extrapolating fluid dynamics far outside the trained parameter space.

The model also showcased efficient computational time relative to a full CFD simulation, achieving significant speed advantages while maintaining accuracy. The approach also involved optimizing the coarse mesh during training, which was shown to improve prediction quality by automating the refinement of the simulation mesh based on gradients computed through the network.

Implications and Future Directions

The integration of differentiable simulators with graph-based neural networks represents a step towards more capable hybrid methodologies in simulations of physical systems. This convergence can extend beyond fluid dynamics into domains characterized by intensive computation and complex, dynamic behavior captured by PDEs. Further research could focus on extending the current model to three-dimensional flows and more complex geometries or coupling with other physical phenomena.

The utilization of a differentiable simulator as a network layer warrants interest for applications requiring real-time predictions under rapidly changing circumstances, such as autonomous vehicle navigation and real-time climate modeling. The practical implications of such efficient computational frameworks could be broad, enhancing interactive simulation capabilities in both industrial applications and exploratory scientific research.