Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 41 tok/s
GPT-5 High 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 477 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 222 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Approaching the Self-Dual Point of the Sinh-Gordon model (2007.00154v1)

Published 30 Jun 2020 in hep-th, cond-mat.stat-mech, hep-lat, and nlin.SI

Abstract: One of the most striking but mysterious properties of the sinh-Gordon model (ShG) is the $b \rightarrow 1/b$ self-duality of its $S$-matrix, of which there is no trace in its Lagrangian formulation. Here $b$ is the coupling appearing in the model's eponymous hyperbolic cosine present in its Lagrangian, $\cosh(b\phi)$. In this paper we develop truncated spectrum methods (TSMs) for studying the sinh-Gordon model at a finite volume as we vary the coupling constant. We obtain the expected results for $b \ll 1$ and intermediate values of $b$, but as the self-dual point $b=1$ is approached, the basic application of the TSM to the ShG breaks down. We find that the TSM gives results with a strong cutoff $E_c$ dependence, which disappears according only to a very slow power law in $E_c$. Standard renormalization group strategies -- whether they be numerical or analytic -- also fail to improve upon matters here. We thus explore three strategies to address the basic limitations of the TSM in the vicinity of $b=1$. In the first, we focus on the small-volume spectrum. We attempt to understand how much of the physics of the ShG is encoded in the zero mode part of its Hamiltonian, in essence how quantum mechanical' vsquantum field theoretic' the problem is. In the second, we identify the divergencies present in perturbation theory and perform their resummation using a supra-Borel approximate. In the third approach, we use the exact form factors of the model to treat the ShG at one value of $b$ as a perturbation of a ShG at a different coupling. In the light of this work, we argue that the strong coupling phase $b > 1$ of the Lagrangian formulation of model may be different from what is na\"ively inferred from its $S$-matrix. In particular, we present an argument that the theory is massless for $b>1$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube