Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
90 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
48 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
22 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
18 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
100 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
78 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
467 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
208 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Potential model prediction of fully-heavy tetraquarks $QQ\bar{Q}\bar{Q}$ ($Q=c, b$) (2006.13756v4)

Published 23 Jun 2020 in hep-ph

Abstract: The fully-heavy tetraquark states $QQ\bar{Q}\bar{Q}$ ($Q=c, b$) are systematically investigated by means of a nonrelativistic potential model. The model is based on the lattice QCD study of the two-body $Q\bar{Q}$ interaction, which exhibits a spin-independent Cornell potential along with a spin-spin interaction. The four-body problem is implemented with a highly accurate computational approach, the Gaussian expansion method. The complex scaling method is also employed so that the bound, resonance, and scattering states can be treated on the same footing. Complete set of the four-body configurations, including meson-meson, diquark-antidiquark, and K-type configurations, as well as their couplings, are considered for spin-parity quantum numbers $J{PC}=0{++}$, $1{+-}$, and $2{++}$ in the $S$-wave channel. No $S$-wave bound state is found either in the fully-charm tetraquark system or in the fully-bottom one. However, several narrow resonances, with widths less than 10 MeV in two-meson strong decay, are found in both of these two systems. For the fully-charm case, the recently reported resonance structures between 6.2 and 7.2 GeV in the di-$J/\psi$ invariant spectrum by the LHCb collaboration, can be well identified in our calculation. For the fully-bottom case, resonances with masses between 18.9 and 19.6 GeV are found. The predicted resonances can be further examined in future experiments.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.