Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Wireless Communications for Collaborative Federated Learning (2006.02499v2)

Published 3 Jun 2020 in cs.IT, cs.LG, and math.IT

Abstract: Internet of Things (IoT) services will use machine learning tools to efficiently analyze various types of data collected by IoT devices for inference, autonomy, and control purposes. However, due to resource constraints and privacy challenges, edge IoT devices may not be able to transmit their collected data to a central controller for training machine learning models. To overcome this challenge, federated learning (FL) has been proposed as a means for enabling edge devices to train a shared machine learning model without data exchanges thus reducing communication overhead and preserving data privacy. However, Google's seminal FL algorithm requires all devices to be directly connected with a central controller, which significantly limits its application scenarios. In this context, this paper introduces a novel FL framework, called collaborative FL (CFL), which enables edge devices to implement FL with less reliance on a central controller. The fundamentals of this framework are developed and then, a number of communication techniques are proposed so as to improve the performance of CFL. To this end, an overview of centralized learning, Google's seminal FL, and CFL is first presented. For each type of learning, the basic architecture as well as its advantages, drawbacks, and usage conditions are introduced. Then, three CFL performance metrics are presented and a suite of communication techniques ranging from network formation, device scheduling, mobility management, and coding is introduced to optimize the performance of CFL. For each technique, future research opportunities are also discussed. In a nutshell, this article will showcase how the proposed CFL framework can be effectively implemented at the edge of large-scale wireless systems such as the Internet of Things.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Mingzhe Chen (110 papers)
  2. H. Vincent Poor (884 papers)
  3. Walid Saad (378 papers)
  4. Shuguang Cui (275 papers)
Citations (144)

Summary

Wireless Communications for Collaborative Federated Learning

The paper explores the adaptation of Federated Learning (FL) frameworks to enhance applications in wireless networks, specifically addressing the constraints observed in traditional FL methodologies proposed by Google. The challenge with conventional FL is its dependence on a central controller to which all participating devices must maintain connectivity. This centralization creates a bottleneck in scenarios where resource scarcity or privacy concerns inhibit direct data exchanges. To mitigate this limitation and broaden the applicable scenarios of FL, the authors introduce a novel approach termed Collaborative Federated Learning (CFL).

Overview of Federated Learning Frameworks

The document systematically distinguishes between different machine learning paradigms applied in IoT environments: Centralized Learning (CL), Original Federated Learning (OFL), and the newly proposed CFL. Each model is dissected to understand its architecture, advantages, drawbacks, and situational suitability.

  1. Centralized Learning (CL): CL represents a model where data from all devices is leveraged in a central computation environment to generate a global model. Despite achieving optimal accuracy, it raises significant privacy concerns and demands substantial computational resources not always feasible in IoT settings.
  2. Original Federated Learning (OFL): OFL addresses privacy by allowing devices to train models locally, only submitting model updates to a centralized server for aggregation. Although this framework preserves privacy better than CL, it still demands stable connectivity to the server, which may not be viable in all environments due to bandwidth and energy constraints.
  3. Collaborative Federated Learning (CFL): Proposed as an evolution of OFL, CFL introduces a decentralized approach by enabling peer-to-peer model sharing among devices, thus reducing the reliance on a centralized server. CFL optimizes resource usage and extends FL applicability in large-scale, decentralized networks such as the IoT.

Performance Metrics and Challenges

The authors identify three key performance metrics for evaluating CFL in wireless networks:

  • Loss Function Value: Key in evaluating a federated learning model's effectiveness, the functionality's dependence on multiple local FL models makes it susceptible to transmission errors and resource constraint challenges in wireless environments.
  • Convergence Time: CFL's iterative nature requires the consideration of local model transmission delays and optimization of computational resource usage. Efficient device scheduling and network topology are crucial for minimizing convergence time.
  • Energy Consumption: A critical factor when assessing the practicality of CFL in IoT environments. The paper suggests optimizing transmission schemes and updating strategies to conserve energy without compromising learning efficacy.

Additionally, reliability emerges as another metric influencing CFL deployment, necessitating robust communication links and error correction methodologies to ensure model integrity across phases of iteration.

Communication Techniques Enhancements

The paper offers several strategies to enhance CFL implementation in decentralized wireless settings:

  • Network Formation: Given the decentralized nature of CFL, understanding and optimizing network topologies (grid, path, star, etc.) are vital. Effective topology can minimize communication overhead and enhance model convergence.
  • Device Scheduling: Implementing intelligent scheduling algorithms that consider data significance and task requirements ensures optimal collaboration and resource utilization among devices.
  • Coding Techniques: Utilization of advanced coding techniques like source coding for data compression and error-correcting coding for robust communication can considerably improve data throughput and model reliability.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The exploration of CFL represents a significant shift from centralized control towards more adaptive, resilient computing paradigms in resource-constrained wireless networks. While CFL addresses a variety of hurdles present in OFL, its application opens new directions for research into distributed intelligence across wireless networks, ultimately pushing the boundaries of AI's deployment in IoT infrastructure. Future work may delve into optimized coding methods aligning with evolving network architectures, and further enhancements in CFL to facilitate ubiquitous adoption in diverse IoT scenarios.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com