Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Text Recognition in the Wild: A Survey (2005.03492v3)

Published 7 May 2020 in cs.CV
Text Recognition in the Wild: A Survey

Abstract: The history of text can be traced back over thousands of years. Rich and precise semantic information carried by text is important in a wide range of vision-based application scenarios. Therefore, text recognition in natural scenes has been an active research field in computer vision and pattern recognition. In recent years, with the rise and development of deep learning, numerous methods have shown promising in terms of innovation, practicality, and efficiency. This paper aims to (1) summarize the fundamental problems and the state-of-the-art associated with scene text recognition; (2) introduce new insights and ideas; (3) provide a comprehensive review of publicly available resources; (4) point out directions for future work. In summary, this literature review attempts to present the entire picture of the field of scene text recognition. It provides a comprehensive reference for people entering this field, and could be helpful to inspire future research. Related resources are available at our Github repository: https://github.com/HCIILAB/Scene-Text-Recognition.

Text Recognition in the Wild: A Survey

The paper "Text Recognition in the Wild: A Survey" by Chen et al. provides an extensive examination of the domain of scene text recognition (STR) within the field of computer vision. It highlights the significance of automated text recognition, especially in complex and varied natural scenes. This analysis covers fundamental challenges, methodologies, datasets, and future research directions.

Fundamental Challenges

STR is differentiated from traditional OCR by the variability and complexity of natural scenes. Key challenges include:

  • Background Complexity: Unlike the clean background in scanned documents, scene text must be distinguished from heterogeneous and textured backgrounds.
  • Diverse Fonts and Text Shapes: Scene text often varies in size, color, and orientation, complicating recognition processes.
  • Noise and Distortion: Imperfect imaging conditions, such as blurring and low resolution, pose significant distractions.

Methodologies

The evolution of STR methodologies is marked by distinct phases:

  • Segmentation-Based Methods: Early approaches relied on segmenting text into characters and employing hand-crafted features for recognition. These methods achieved limited success due to the intricate character segmentation problem.
  • Segmentation-Free Methods: Modern algorithms avoid explicit character segmentation through sequence-to-sequence models utilizing deep learning architectures, notably Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) and attention mechanisms. The recent focus on robust rectification models further underscores the adaptability of these approaches to irregular text orientations.

Deep Learning Advancements

Deep learning has significantly enhanced the efficacy of STR. The incorporation of CNNs and RNNs has allowed for more robust feature extraction and sequence modeling, respectively. Moreover, the trend towards end-to-end systems—integrating detection and recognition—demonstrates a shift towards holistic text recognition systems with improved performance and efficiency. Despite these advancements, challenges in system integration and optimization persist, especially for complex text arrangements and multilingual settings.

Evaluation and Datasets

A comprehensive analysis of datasets reveals that synthetic data generation plays a crucial role in training data-intensive models. However, the evaluation of STR systems is complicated by variations in datasets and evaluation protocols. The paper highlights the necessity for standardized testing environments to ensure fair comparisons.

Implications and Future Directions

The survey underscores the importance of advancing STR in correspondence with practical applications such as intelligent transport systems and multimedia retrieval. It suggests exploring alternative methodologies, such as leveraging NLP to enhance capabilities. Additionally, the paper calls for further research on security implications and robust adversarial defenses.

Moreover, expanding STR capabilities for multilingual contexts and non-Latin scripts remains a high-priority direction, necessitating both algorithmic innovation and comprehensive multilingual datasets.

Conclusion

Chen et al. provide a detailed landscape of STR research, acknowledging both achievements and challenges. By scrutinizing methodologies and datasets, the paper serves as a critical resource for advancing research in the field. As STR technology continues to evolve, the theoretical and practical insights presented will guide researchers in addressing the field's open questions and unlocking its full potential.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Xiaoxue Chen (22 papers)
  2. Lianwen Jin (116 papers)
  3. Yuanzhi Zhu (21 papers)
  4. Canjie Luo (20 papers)
  5. Tianwei Wang (6 papers)
Citations (94)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com