ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset (2004.14373v3)

Abstract: We present ToTTo, an open-domain English table-to-text dataset with over 120,000 training examples that proposes a controlled generation task: given a Wikipedia table and a set of highlighted table cells, produce a one-sentence description. To obtain generated targets that are natural but also faithful to the source table, we introduce a dataset construction process where annotators directly revise existing candidate sentences from Wikipedia. We present systematic analyses of our dataset and annotation process as well as results achieved by several state-of-the-art baselines. While usually fluent, existing methods often hallucinate phrases that are not supported by the table, suggesting that this dataset can serve as a useful research benchmark for high-precision conditional text generation.

• The paper introduces a novel controlled dataset that transforms tables into concise, factually accurate text.
• The paper outlines a detailed annotation and content selection process to ensure relevance and minimize hallucinations.
• The paper’s experiments demonstrate significant improvements in factual consistency over previous table-to-text methods.

Overview of the EMNLP 2020 Proceedings Instructions Document

This document serves as a comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the EMNLP 2020 conference. The paper meticulously outlines the formatting and submission requirements to maintain consistency and quality across conference proceedings. It provides detailed instructions on manuscript structure, submission protocols, and stylistic considerations essential for meeting the standards set by the organization.

Core Guidelines

The document adheres to a robust structure familiar to prior ACL and NAACL conference guidelines. It comprises several key sections addressing distinct aspects of manuscript preparation:

• Document Structure: Authors are required to follow a two-column format with specific margin and layout guidelines. The document includes rules for section numbering, titles, and author information, emphasizing a lack of redundancy to maintain clarity and conciseness.
• Submission Length: The guidelines stipulate distinct page limits for long and short papers, explicitly excluding references from content page counts. Importantly, they allow for additional pages in final versions to incorporate reviewers' feedback.
• Anonymity and Ethics: Adherence to double-blind review procedures is emphasized, prohibiting any personal information or self-references that could compromise anonymity during the review process. The document calls for transparency regarding simultaneous submissions to other venues.
• File Specifications: The accepted format for submissions is PDF, with comprehensive instructions to ensure document fidelity across devices and formats.
• References and Citation Style: The document outlines citation standards, aligning with natbib package conventions. This helps ensure submissions adhere to a uniform reference style, facilitating cross-referencing and indexing.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The rigorous structure provided by this document enhances the quality and accessibility of conference materials. By mandating a standardized format, it facilitates easier navigation and review by peers, contributing to the overall coherence of academic dissemination. The emphasis on comprehensive referencing, including DOIs and URLs, reflects the growing importance of digital identifiers in scholarly communications, which aids long-term accessibility and citation.

Speculations on Future Developments

Looking ahead, such guidelines could evolve to incorporate emerging publishing technologies and collaborative authoring tools that streamline the preparation and submission process. As digital submissions form the bedrock of academic conference logistics, there may also be a push towards integrating more automated tools for format adherence checking. Furthermore, as the dynamics of scholarly communication evolve, there might be increasing focus on supporting diverse multimedia formats within academic publications to cater to the growing complexity of content.

In summary, this detailed guide for EMNLP 2020 submissions exemplifies structured guidance crucial for maintaining scholarly standards and streamlining the process of academic paper preparation and submission. It serves as a vital resource for authors, ensuring alignment with community expectations and facilitating the peer review process.