Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
94 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
55 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
38 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
24 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
106 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
98 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
518 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
188 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Anisotropic Gaussian approximation in $L_2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ (1910.10319v1)

Published 23 Oct 2019 in math.CA

Abstract: Let $\mathcal{D}$ be the dictionary of Gaussian mixtures: the functions created by affine change of variables of a single Gaussian in $n$ dimensions. $\mathcal{D}$ is used pervasively in scientific applications to a degree that practitioners often employ it as their default choice for representing their scientific object. Its use in applications hinges on the perception that this dictionary is large enough, and its members are local enough in space and frequency, to provide efficient approximation to "almost all objects of interest". However, and perhaps surprisingly, only a handful of concrete theoretical results are actually known on the ability to use Gaussian mixtures in lieu of mainstream representation systems. The present paper shows that, in 2D, Gaussian mixtures are effective in resolving anisotropic structures, too. In this setup, the "smoothness class" is comprised of 2D functions that are sparsely represented using curvelets. An algorithm for $N$-term approximation from (a small subset of) $\mathcal{D}$ is presented, and the error bounds are then shown to be on par with the errors of $N$-term curvelet approximation. The latter are optimal, essentially by definition. Our approach is based on providing effective approximation from $\mathcal{D}$ to the members of the curvelet system, mimicking the approach in arXiv:0802.2517 and arXiv:0911.2803 where the mother wavelets are approximated. When the error is measured in the $1$-norm, this adaptation of the prior approach, combined with standard tools, yields the desired results. However, handling the $2$-norm case is much more subtle and requires substantial new machinery: in this case, the error analysis cannot be solely done on the space domain: some of it has to be carried out on frequency. Since, on frequency, all members of $\mathcal{D}$ are centered at the origin, a delicate analysis for controlling the error there is needed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.