- The paper presents an empirical prediction of Solar Cycle 25’s sunspot number, identifying SSN maxima of 82±8 and 133±11 on two scales.
- It analyzes transitions in solar polar magnetic fields, highlighting a shift from solar-cycle-like to anti-solar-cycle variations during Cycle 24.
- The study revisits the heliospheric magnetic field floor level, suggesting reduced solar magnetic activity with significant implications for space weather forecasting.
Prediction for the Amplitude of Solar Cycle 25
The paper "Another Mini Solar Maximum in the Offing: A Prediction for the Amplitude of Solar Cycle 25" by Susanta Kumar Bisoi et al. presents an empirical analysis of solar polar magnetic fields (PMF) and heliospheric magnetic fields (HMF) to predict the properties of the forthcoming Solar Cycle 25. This prediction is crucial for understanding solar activity's impact on space weather, which has practical implications for satellite operations and space missions.
The authors identify a transition in the behavior of unsigned solar polar magnetic fields, which exhibit an anti-solar-cycle-like variation in Solar Cycle 24, deviating from the solar-cycle-like patterns observed in Cycles 21 and 22. This transition is crucial as it suggests differences in the solar dynamo processes influencing solar magnetic fields. The unsigned PMF shows a steady decline in field strength starting in the mid-1990s, only to unexpectedly increase in 2015, reflecting complex changes in the solar magnetic environment.
The paper further revisits the HMF floor level at the solar minimum of Cycle 24, predicting a reduced floor level compared to previous cycles. This lower floor level is indicative of an overall reduction in solar magnetic activity, aligning with the weakened solar cycles observed over recent decades.
Based on these insights, the authors provide predictions for the amplitude of Solar Cycle 25 using both the original (V1.0) and revised (V2.0) sunspot number (SSN) scales. They predict SSN maxima of 82±8 and 133±11, respectively, indicating a stronger solar cycle than Cycle 24 and suggesting another "mini solar maximum." The prediction remains consistent even if the Cycle 24 minimum is delayed to 2021.
The implications of these findings suggest that despite a trend towards diminishing solar activity, Cycle 25 could present higher solar activity than observed in Cycle 24. This holds significant implications for forecasting solar influences on space weather, necessitating updates in operational planning for current and future space missions.
Looking toward future developments, this paper highlights the potential for improved solar cycle predictions using more refined data and advanced computational models. Understanding the dynamo processes and mechanisms generating these magnetic fields could further elucidate the complexities of solar cycle dynamics.
In summary, the research provides a nuanced prediction of Solar Cycle 25's amplitude, reflecting the intricate and evolving solar magnetic field's dynamics and their broader implications for space weather forecasting and scientific inquiry.