Co-citations in context: disciplinary heterogeneity is relevant (1909.08738v1)
Abstract: Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are cited, provides insight into how documents relate to each other and across fields. Co-citation analysis has been used to characterize combinations of prior work as conventional or innovative and to derive features of highly cited publications. Given the organization of science into disciplines, a key question is the sensitivity of such analyses to frame of reference. Our study examines this question using semantically-themed citation networks. We observe that trends reported to be true across the scientific literature do not hold for focused citation networks, and we conclude that inferring novelty using co-citation analysis and random graph models benefits from disciplinary context.
- James Bradley (4 papers)
- Sitaram Devarakonda (4 papers)
- Avon Davey (1 paper)
- Dmitriy Korobskiy (6 papers)
- Siyu Liu (45 papers)
- Djamil Lakhdar-Hamina (2 papers)
- Tandy Warnow (22 papers)
- George Chacko (15 papers)