Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Image inpainting: A review (1909.06399v1)

Published 13 Sep 2019 in cs.CV

Abstract: Although image inpainting, or the art of repairing the old and deteriorated images, has been around for many years, it has gained even more popularity because of the recent development in image processing techniques. With the improvement of image processing tools and the flexibility of digital image editing, automatic image inpainting has found important applications in computer vision and has also become an important and challenging topic of research in image processing. This paper is a brief review of the existing image inpainting approaches we first present a global vision on the existing methods for image inpainting. We attempt to collect most of the existing approaches and classify them into three categories, namely, sequential-based, CNN-based and GAN-based methods. In addition, for each category, a list of methods for the different types of distortion on the images is presented. Furthermore, collect a list of the available datasets and discuss these in our paper. This is a contribution for digital image inpainting researchers trying to look for the available datasets because there is a lack of datasets available for image inpainting. As the final step in this overview, we present the results of real evaluations of the three categories of image inpainting methods performed on the datasets used, for the different types of image distortion. In the end, we also present the evaluations metrics and discuss the performance of these methods in terms of these metrics. This overview can be used as a reference for image inpainting researchers, and it can also facilitate the comparison of the methods as well as the datasets used. The main contribution of this paper is the presentation of the three categories of image inpainting methods along with a list of available datasets that the researchers can use to evaluate their proposed methodology against.

Citations (273)

Summary

  • The paper provides a comprehensive classification of inpainting methods into sequential, CNN, and GAN-based approaches to reconstruct damaged image regions.
  • The study details the strengths and challenges of each methodology, including handling complex scenes and addressing high computational demands.
  • It highlights critical benchmarks using metrics like MSE, PSNR, and SSIM while emphasizing the need for standardized datasets in inpainting research.

A Review of Image Inpainting Techniques

The paper "Image inpainting: A review" by Omar Elharrouss, Noor Almaadeed, Somaya Al-Maadeed, and Younes Akbari provides a comprehensive survey of image inpainting methodologies, a pivotal area in computer vision and digital image processing. Image inpainting involves reconstructing lost or deteriorated parts of images, an operation that has gained substantial significance with advancements in image processing technologies. The authors classify the prevailing image inpainting approaches into three primary categories: sequential-based methods, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based approaches, and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based techniques. These methods address various forms of image distortions, from simple block fills to complex text and object removal.

Sequential-Based Approaches: Within this category, techniques are further divided into patch-based and diffusion-based methods. Patch-based strategies work by identifying analogous patches within the undistorted parts of the image and transferring them to the damaged regions. Notable works include methods leveraging Markov Random Field (MRF) models and low-rank approximations, offering solid results particularly in texture redistribution tasks. Diffusion-based methods, on the other hand, focus on progressively propagating surrounding pixel information into vacant regions, employing techniques like non-local Mumford-Shah models and fractional-order derivatives to perform the inpainting. Despite demonstrating robust performance in specific contexts, sequential methods often struggle with highly complex scenes due to their reliance on pre-existing patterns within the image.

CNN-Based Approaches: These approaches utilize the power of deep learning to enhance the granularity and coherence of inpainting processes. CNN-based methods like Shift-Net and blind inpainting networks have shown considerable improvements over classical methods by successfully capturing global contexts and reconstructing finer details through architectures such as encoder-decoder networks. The capability of CNNs to process vast and varied datasets is instrumental in dealing with a broad spectrum of image distortions, though challenges remain particularly with non-trivial image content requiring structured semantic understanding.

GAN-Based Approaches: GANs present a promising avenue for image inpainting owing to their generator and discriminator structure. By training networks to distinguish actual from generated image content, GANs refine and enhance inpainting outputs beyond traditional methods. Progressive inpainting and contextual attention models in GANs offer enhanced texture and structural coherence, albeit at high computational costs. The use of GAN frameworks like the Wasserstein GAN reinforces the generation of high-fidelity inpainting results even in complex scenes.

A significant focus of the paper is also on datasets used for evaluating inpainting methodologies. Commonly utilized datasets include Paris StreetView, ImageNet, and Places, among others. These datasets vary in terms of content, ranging from natural and urban scenes to facial images, supporting comprehensive assessments of algorithmic performance across diverse scenarios. The paper underlines a critical challenge in inpainting research: the limited availability of standardized datasets explicitly designed for training and evaluating inpainting techniques, which can hinder consistent benchmarking of proposed solutions.

In terms of metrics, the paper indicates that Mean Squared Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) are prevalently adopted to quantify restoration quality across different inpainting strategies.

While this review offers a lucid categorization of current image inpainting methodologies, it also highlights areas necessitating further investigation, particularly concerning the computational demands of GANs and the seamless integration of context in CNNs. As the field progresses, future developments may improve model efficiency and applicability across wider domains, perhaps integrating hybrid learning frameworks that unify the advantages of both classical and deep learning-based approaches. The authors' detailed cataloging of available datasets serves as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to enhance their methodological frameworks against standard benchmark challenges. Overall, this paper forms a substantial reference point, encapsulating the current state of image inpainting and outlining persistent challenges and potential future trajectories in computational image restoration research.