Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View (1909.03211v2)

Published 7 Sep 2019 in cs.LG, cs.SI, and stat.ML

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved promising performance on a wide range of graph-based tasks. Despite their success, one severe limitation of GNNs is the over-smoothing issue (indistinguishable representations of nodes in different classes). In this work, we present a systematic and quantitative study on the over-smoothing issue of GNNs. First, we introduce two quantitative metrics, MAD and MADGap, to measure the smoothness and over-smoothness of the graph nodes representations, respectively. Then, we verify that smoothing is the nature of GNNs and the critical factor leading to over-smoothness is the low information-to-noise ratio of the message received by the nodes, which is partially determined by the graph topology. Finally, we propose two methods to alleviate the over-smoothing issue from the topological view: (1) MADReg which adds a MADGap-based regularizer to the training objective;(2) AdaGraph which optimizes the graph topology based on the model predictions. Extensive experiments on 7 widely-used graph datasets with 10 typical GNN models show that the two proposed methods are effective for relieving the over-smoothing issue, thus improving the performance of various GNN models.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Deli Chen (20 papers)
  2. Yankai Lin (125 papers)
  3. Wei Li (1122 papers)
  4. Peng Li (390 papers)
  5. Jie Zhou (687 papers)
  6. Xu Sun (194 papers)
Citations (986)

Summary

Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View

Introduction

This paper addresses a critical issue faced by Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): the over-smoothing problem, where node representations across different classes become indistinguishable when multiple layers are stacked, degrading the model's performance in tasks such as node classification. The paper introduces two novel metrics—Mean Average Distance (MAD) and MADGap—to quantify smoothness and over-smoothness in GNNs, respectively. Additionally, the authors propose two methods to mitigate over-smoothing: MADReg and Adaptive Edge Optimization (AdaEdge).

Over-smoothing Analysis with MAD and MADGap

The introduction of the MAD metric provides a quantitative measure of the smoothness of graph node representations. Calculating the cosine distance between node pairs, MAD reflects how similar these representations are within the same graph. The empirical analysis using MAD demonstrates that the smoothness of graph representations increases as the number of GNN layers increases. This finding supports the hypothesis that smoothing is an intrinsic property of GNNs but poses a risk for over-smoothing, characterized by too much similarity among node representations from different classes.

To identify the root cause of over-smoothing, the authors extend MAD to MADGap, which differentiates between the smoothness of node representations among nearby and remote nodes. The definition involves calculating the MAD for neighbor nodes (MADneb) and for remote nodes (MADrmt) and then measuring the gap (MADGap). A high MADGap indicates that useful intra-class information outweighs inter-class noise, leading to better model performance and reduced over-smoothing.

Relationship Between Topology and Over-smoothing

The authors argue that the graph topology significantly influences the information-to-noise ratio, which in turn affects the smoothness of node representations. Specifically, graphs with many inter-class edges tend to propagate more noise, leading to over-smoothing. Experimental manipulation of graph topology (i.e., removing inter-class edges and adding intra-class edges) affirms that optimizing the topology can effectively mitigate over-smoothing and enhance model performance.

Mitigating Over-smoothing: MADReg and AdaEdge

To address over-smoothing, the paper proposes two methods: MADReg and AdaEdge. MADReg incorporates MADGap as a regularizer in the training objective, explicitly encouraging the model to maintain distinct representations for different classes. Meanwhile, AdaEdge iteratively refines the graph topology based on the model’s predictions, optimizing it dynamically for better performance in downstream tasks.

Experimental Validation

Extensive experiments are conducted on seven widely-used graph datasets and ten typical GNN models. The paper shows that both MADReg and AdaEdge are effective in reducing over-smoothing and improving the performance of GNNs. For instance, in experiments with 4-layer GNNs—a scenario prone to severe over-smoothing—both methods significantly increase MADGap and the model’s prediction accuracy across different datasets.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings underscore the importance of considering graph topology when designing and training GNNs. While current approaches mostly focus on novel architectures for information propagation, this paper highlights that aligning the graph topology with the task objective is equally crucial. Optimizing topology not only alleviates over-smoothing but also leads to better utilization of GNN capabilities.

Moving forward, an intriguing research direction involves further refining the AdaEdge methodology to reduce incorrect edge adjustment operations, which could potentially introduce noise rather than useful information. Additionally, exploring the application of these methods to dynamic graphs where the topology changes over time could open new avenues for enhancing GNN performance in real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive and quantitative investigation into the over-smoothing problem in GNNs, introducing effective metrics and methods for mitigation. By demonstrating the critical role of topology in GNN performance, the paper sets a foundation for future research focused on graph topology optimization. Both MADReg and AdaEdge offer valuable strategies for enhancing GNN robustness and efficacy, particularly in challenging tasks involving complex graph structures.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com