Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The XMM-Newton Wide Field Survey in the COSMOS Field: Clustering Dependence of X-ray Selected AGN on Host Galaxy Properties (1906.07911v2)

Published 19 Jun 2019 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We study the spatial clustering through the projected two-point correlation function of $632$ $(1130)$ XMM-COSMOS Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) with known spectroscopic (spectroscopic or photometric) redshifts in the range $z = [0.1 - 2.5]$ in order to measure the AGN bias and estimate the typical mass of the hosting dark matter (DM) halo as a function of AGN host galaxy properties. We create AGN subsamples in terms of stellar mass $M_$ and specific black hole accretion rate $L_X/M_$, to probe how AGN environment depends on these quantities. For the full spectroscopic AGN sample, we measure a typical DM halo mass of $\log (M_\mathrm{halo} / h{-1}\mathrm{M}_\odot)= 12.79_{-0.43}{+0.26}$, similar to galaxy group environments and in line with previous studies for moderate-luminosity X-ray selected AGN. We find no significant dependence on $L_X/M_$, with $\log (M_\mathrm{halo} / h{-1}\mathrm{M}_\odot) = 13.06_{-0.38}{+0.23}$ ($12.97_{-1.26}{+0.39}$) for the low (high) $L_X/M_$ subsample. We also find no difference in the hosting halos in terms of $M_$ with $\log (M_\mathrm{halo} / h{-1}\mathrm{M}_\odot) = 12.93_{-0.62}{+0.31}$ ($12.90_{-0.62}{+0.30}$) for the low (high) $M_$ subsample. By comparing the $M_-M_\mathrm{halo}$ relation derived for XMM-COSMOS AGN subsamples with what is expected for normal non-active galaxies by abundance matching and clustering results, we find that the typical DM halo mass of our high $M_$ AGN subsample is similar to that of non-active galaxies. However, AGNs in our low $M_$ subsample are found in more massive halos than non-active galaxies. By excluding AGNs in galaxy groups from the clustering analysis, we find evidence that the result for low $M_$ may be due a larger fraction of AGNs as satellites in massive halos.

Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.