Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks (1905.12265v3)

Published 29 May 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Many applications of machine learning require a model to make accurate pre-dictions on test examples that are distributionally different from training ones, while task-specific labels are scarce during training. An effective approach to this challenge is to pre-train a model on related tasks where data is abundant, and then fine-tune it on a downstream task of interest. While pre-training has been effective in many language and vision domains, it remains an open question how to effectively use pre-training on graph datasets. In this paper, we develop a new strategy and self-supervised methods for pre-training Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The key to the success of our strategy is to pre-train an expressive GNN at the level of individual nodes as well as entire graphs so that the GNN can learn useful local and global representations simultaneously. We systematically study pre-training on multiple graph classification datasets. We find that naive strategies, which pre-train GNNs at the level of either entire graphs or individual nodes, give limited improvement and can even lead to negative transfer on many downstream tasks. In contrast, our strategy avoids negative transfer and improves generalization significantly across downstream tasks, leading up to 9.4% absolute improvements in ROC-AUC over non-pre-trained models and achieving state-of-the-art performance for molecular property prediction and protein function prediction.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Weihua Hu (24 papers)
  2. Bowen Liu (63 papers)
  3. Joseph Gomes (10 papers)
  4. Marinka Zitnik (79 papers)
  5. Percy Liang (239 papers)
  6. Vijay Pande (13 papers)
  7. Jure Leskovec (233 papers)
Citations (1,273)

Summary

Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks: A Detailed Overview

The paper "Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks" by Hu et al. explores a comprehensive methodology for enhancing the performance of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) through effective pre-training strategies. With the burgeoning applications of GNNs across diverse scientific domains, this work addresses the crucial challenge of pre-training on graph datasets to improve downstream task performance.

The authors systematically investigate pre-training methods for GNNs, adopting both node-level and graph-level approaches to capture local and global structural information. Their primary focus is to mitigate the challenges posed by scarce task-specific labeled data and the presence of out-of-distribution samples in real-world graphs.

Core Contributions

  1. Node-level Pre-training Approaches:
    • Context Prediction: This method leverages the structural context surrounding a node's neighborhood to learn robust node embeddings. The idea is to predict the surrounding subgraph, encouraging GNNs to distinguish between different node types and roles within their contexts.
    • Attribute Masking: This technique masks a portion of node or edge attributes and trains the GNN to predict these masked attributes. It capitalizes on the local regularities and correlations in graph attributes, beneficial for richly annotated scientific graphs.
  2. Graph-level Pre-training:
    • Supervised Graph-level Property Prediction: This approach involves multi-task supervised pre-training where the GNN is trained on a diverse set of graph-level tasks. This method aims to encode domain-specific knowledge into graph representations.
    • Structural Similarity Prediction: While not extensively covered in this paper, this approach would involve tasks like predicting graph edit distances or structural similarities.
  3. Integrated Pre-training Strategy: The authors propose a combined strategy where node-level self-supervised pre-training is followed by graph-level supervised pre-training. This combined approach ensures that node embeddings are contextually enriched, which in turn fosters better generalization and transferability of graph-level representations.

Empirical Validation

The empirical evaluation involved two primary domains: molecular property prediction and protein function prediction, utilizing extensive datasets with thousands of graphs for pre-training and downstream tasks.

  • Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN): The GIN architecture, recognized for its expressive power, was primarily used for experimentation. The results demonstrated that pre-training significantly boosted performance, especially when both node-level and graph-level pre-training techniques were employed together.
  • Baseline Comparisons:
    • Node-level vs. Graph-level Pre-training: Both approaches independently provided improvements over non-pre-trained models. However, extensive graph-level supervised pre-training alone often led to negative transfer on some tasks.
    • Combined Strategy: The integrated pre-training approach consistently outperformed individual pre-training methods across diverse tasks, achieving state-of-the-art results on several benchmark datasets.

Implications and Future Directions

  1. Pre-training Benefits:
    • Performance Improvement: The integrated pre-training strategy yielded up to 9.4% absolute improvements in ROC-AUC over non-pre-trained models.
    • Faster Convergence: Pre-trained models showed significantly faster convergence rates during fine-tuning, illustrating the efficiency benefits of pre-training.
  2. Theoretical Insights:
    • Contextual Node Embeddings: The success of Context Prediction highlights the importance of embedding nodes in their structural contexts rather than in isolation.
    • Negative Transfer Mitigation: The combined pre-training approach effectively mitigates the negative transfer issue observed with naively extensive graph-level supervised pre-training, underscoring the need for multi-scale strategies.
  3. Future Developments:
    • Refinement of GNN Architectures: Further improvements in GNN architectures and fine-tuning protocols hold potential for even greater gains.
    • Expanding Domains: The methodology can be applied to other domains such as physics, material science, and structural biology, where graph representations are ubiquitous.
    • Understanding Pre-trained Models: Investigating the internal workings of pre-trained GNNs can provide insights that aid scientific discovery and explain model predictions.

The paper by Hu et al. marks a significant advancement in the pre-training of GNNs, offering valuable strategies to enhance their performance on downstream tasks. By bridging local and global graph representations, this work paves the way for more robust and generalizable graph learning models.