Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Role of User Profile for Fake News Detection (1904.13355v1)

Published 30 Apr 2019 in cs.SI and cs.IR

Abstract: Consuming news from social media is becoming increasingly popular. Social media appeals to users due to its fast dissemination of information, low cost, and easy access. However, social media also enables the widespread of fake news. Because of the detrimental societal effects of fake news, detecting fake news has attracted increasing attention. However, the detection performance only using news contents is generally not satisfactory as fake news is written to mimic true news. Thus, there is a need for an in-depth understanding on the relationship between user profiles on social media and fake news. In this paper, we study the challenging problem of understanding and exploiting user profiles on social media for fake news detection. In an attempt to understand connections between user profiles and fake news, first, we measure users' sharing behaviors on social media and group representative users who are more likely to share fake and real news; then, we perform a comparative analysis of explicit and implicit profile features between these user groups, which reveals their potential to help differentiate fake news from real news. To exploit user profile features, we demonstrate the usefulness of these user profile features in a fake news classification task. We further validate the effectiveness of these features through feature importance analysis. The findings of this work lay the foundation for deeper exploration of user profile features of social media and enhance the capabilities for fake news detection.

An Examination of User Profiles in Fake News Detection

In the rapidly evolving landscape of social media, the proliferation of fake news represents a substantial societal challenge. The paper "The Role of User Profiles for Fake News Detection" offers a detailed exploration into the use of social media user profiles as a means to improve the detection of fake news. This paper posits that relying solely on news content for distinguishing fake news is often inadequate, given the intentionally deceptive nature of such content, which is often made to mimic authentic news. Hence, the focus shifts to understanding the potential role of user profiles in enhancing fake news detection methodologies.

Research Questions and Methodology

The authors structure their investigation around three pivotal research questions:

  1. Which users are more likely to share fake or real news?
  2. What distinct characteristics or features do these users possess, and how do these characteristics differ?
  3. Can user profile features be effectively utilized to discern fake news, and if so, how?

To address these questions, the paper employs a rigorous approach utilizing datasets from Politifact and Gossipcop. The data is collected and analyzed to determine user groups who predominantly share either fake or real news. These groups are identified through both absolute measures (total news shared) and relative measures (fake news ratio scores), allowing the authors to ascertain representative user profiles.

Understanding and Exploiting User Profiles

The paper explores implicit and explicit user profile features to uncover any distinct patterns or correlations. Implicit features like age, personality, location, and political bias are inferred from user behaviors and interactions on social media. Tools such as lexical analysis and machine learning algorithms are employed for this purpose. Notably, users with stronger political biases are observed to be more inclined to circulate fake news.

The analysis distinguishes between explicit features directly available from social media platforms, such as verification status and account activity, and implicit features which require deduction, like political bias or personality traits. Each feature category is critically assessed to determine its potential in differentiating between fake and real news. The authors illustrate that profiles of users predisposed to sharing fake news show discernible variations when compared to those inclined to share real news.

Implications for Fake News Detection

The empirical findings demonstrate the value of incorporating user profile features into fake news detection algorithms. The paper establishes that user profiles not only contain distinctive attributes that can help identify fake news but also exhibit robustness across multiple learning algorithms, as evidenced by achieving an F1 score above 0.90 consistently.

The integration of user profile features into existing detection models significantly enhances the predictive performance over models relying solely on content features. The research underscores the effectiveness of a hybrid approach, combining both user profile data and content analysis for superior fake news detection capabilities.

Future Directions

In concluding, the paper opens several avenues for further research. The authors suggest a nuanced exploration into other user behavior indicators such as reposts and comments that could enrich the identification of fake news. Moreover, the interplay and potential integration of malicious bot detection with fake news propagation analysis present promising directions for future inquiry.

The paper's insights contribute to the theoretical framework on social media misinformation by highlighting the potential of user-centric analyses. By elucidating the correlation between user characteristics and the dissemination of fake news, this research provides a foundational step towards more holistic fake news detection methodologies that leverage user profile data.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Kai Shu (88 papers)
  2. Xinyi Zhou (33 papers)
  3. Suhang Wang (118 papers)
  4. Reza Zafarani (18 papers)
  5. Huan Liu (283 papers)
Citations (193)