Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Tenant GPU Clusters for DNN Training Workloads
This paper presents a comprehensive paper of the intricacies involved in the utilization and scheduling of multi-tenant GPU clusters dedicated to Deep Neural Network (DNN) training workloads. The paper derives its conclusions from a two-month workload trace from Microsoft's {Philly} GPU cluster, providing valuable insights that contribute to the design of next-generation cluster management systems.
Key Findings
Deep learning workloads impose distinct requirements on cluster infrastructure compared to conventional big data workloads. The paper identifies significant challenges in resource allocation and job scheduling due to DNN workloads' dependence on gang scheduling and locality constraints for efficient model training. The analysis highlights three primary issues:
- Gang Scheduling Requirements: DNN frameworks necessitate simultaneous scheduling of all tasks, leading to inelastic job scheduling. This gang scheduling constraint often results in resource fragmentation and extended queuing times.
- Locality Constraints Impact: The enforced locality constraints, essential for efficient data parallelism and inter-GPU communication, significantly influence queuing delays and GPU utilization. The paper shows that relaxing locality constraints can reduce queuing time but simultaneously lower GPU utilization rates due to increased synchronization overheads and resource interference.
- Job Failures: The research indicates an overall job failure rate of approximately 30%, primarily attributed to user-induced errors (misconfigurations, programming errors) and infrastructure-level failures. These failures are costly in terms of GPU time, especially since they often occur late in the job's runtime.
Scheduler Design Implications
The paper provides three practical guidelines for improving cluster schedulers for DNN workloads:
- Prioritize Locality: Considering DNN job longevity, better locality prioritization could enhance GPU efficiency and job runtime, suggesting a strategic trade-off between queuing delays and intra-job locality.
- Interference Mitigation: For optimal GPU utilization, schedulers should mitigate resource contention and interference by intelligently isolating jobs on dedicated hardware nodes when possible, or employing job migration features to alleviate resource fragmentation.
- Enhanced Failure Diagnostics: Implementing preliminary checks for programming errors and maintaining a smaller testing pool of GPUs before scaling jobs can drastically reduce unnecessary resource consumption. Furthermore, schedulers could adopt adaptive retry strategies based on real-time error classification.
Theoretical and Practical Implications
The detailed findings underscore the need for refined scheduling policies that cater to DNN workloads' unique requirements, such as enhanced intra-job communication and efficient GPU utilization in shared environments. They also highlight the potential benefits of real-time diagnostics to reduce failure rates significantly. The theoretical implications call for further research into preemptive scheduling strategies and advanced resource management techniques that could better accommodate the inelastic nature of deep learning jobs.
Future Outlook
Given the increasing relevance of deep learning applications, future developments in AI workload management will likely emphasize automated failure diagnosis, enhanced resource sharing architectures, and dynamic scheduling algorithms that can adapt to varying workload demands. This paper sets the stage for continued exploration of workload-specific enhancements in AI infrastructure, potentially influencing future standards in computational resource management for large-scale DNN training.
The paper not only enhances our understanding of the operational dynamics of multi-tenant GPU clusters but also provides actionable insights to improve the design and efficiency of future machine learning systems. The public availability of the workload trace from this paper is an invaluable resource for further research and development in the domain of AI infrastructure optimization.