Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 96 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Financial Portfolios based on Tsallis Relative Entropy as the Risk Measure (1901.04945v3)

Published 12 Jan 2019 in q-fin.ST

Abstract: Earlier studies have shown that stock market distributions can be well described by distributions derived from Tsallis entropy, which is a generalization of Shannon entropy to non-extensive systems. In this paper, Tsallis relative entropy (TRE), which is the generalization of Kullback-Leibler relative entropy (KLRE) to non-extensive systems, is investigated as a possible risk measure in constructing risk optimal portfolios whose returns beat market returns. Portfolios are constructed by binning the risk values and allocating the stocks to bins according to their risk values. The average return in excess of market returns for each bin is calculated to get the risk-return patterns of the portfolios. The results are compared with those from three other risk measures: 1) the commonly used 'beta' of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), 2) Kullback-Leibler relative entropy, and 3) the relative standard deviation. Tests carried out for both long (~18 years) and shorter terms (~9 years), which include the dot-com bubble and the 2008 crash periods, show that a linear fit can be obtained for the risk-excess return profiles of all four risk measures. However, in all cases, the profiles from Tsallis relative entropy show a more consistent behavior in terms of both goodness of fit and the variation of returns with risk, than the other three risk measures.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)