Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Faster Algorithms for All-Pairs Bounded Min-Cuts (1807.05803v2)

Published 16 Jul 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: The All-Pairs Min-Cut problem (aka All-Pairs Max-Flow) asks to compute a minimum $s$-$t$ cut (or just its value) for all pairs of vertices $s,t$. We study this problem in directed graphs with unit edge/vertex capacities (corresponding to edge/vertex connectivity). Our focus is on the $k$-bounded case, where the algorithm has to find all pairs with min-cut value less than $k$, and report only those. The most basic case $k=1$ is the Transitive Closure (TC) problem, which can be solved in graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges in time $O(mn)$ combinatorially, and in time $O(n{\omega})$ where $\omega<2.38$ is the matrix-multiplication exponent. These time bounds are conjectured to be optimal. We present new algorithms and conditional lower bounds that advance the frontier for larger $k$, as follows: (i) A randomized algorithm for vertex capacities that runs in time $O((nk){\omega})$. (ii) Two deterministic algorithms for edge capacities (which is more general) that work in DAGs and further reports a minimum cut for each pair. The first algorithm is combinatorial (does not involve matrix multiplication) and runs in time $O(2{O(k2)}\cdot mn)$. The second algorithm can be faster on dense DAGs and runs in time $O((k\log n){4k+o(k)} n{\omega})$. (iii) The first super-cubic lower bound of $n{\omega-1-o(1)} k2$ time under the $4$-Clique conjecture, which holds even in the simplest case of DAGs with unit vertex capacities. It improves on the previous (SETH-based) lower bounds even in the unbounded setting $k=n$. For combinatorial algorithms, our reduction implies an $n{2-o(1)} k2$ conditional lower bound. Thus, we identify new settings where the complexity of the problem is (conditionally) higher than that of TC.

Citations (24)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.