Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ANN-Benchmarks: A Benchmarking Tool for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Algorithms (1807.05614v2)

Published 15 Jul 2018 in cs.IR and cs.DB

Abstract: This paper describes ANN-Benchmarks, a tool for evaluating the performance of in-memory approximate nearest neighbor algorithms. It provides a standard interface for measuring the performance and quality achieved by nearest neighbor algorithms on different standard data sets. It supports several different ways of integrating $k$-NN algorithms, and its configuration system automatically tests a range of parameter settings for each algorithm. Algorithms are compared with respect to many different (approximate) quality measures, and adding more is easy and fast; the included plotting front-ends can visualise these as images, $\LaTeX$ plots, and websites with interactive plots. ANN-Benchmarks aims to provide a constantly updated overview of the current state of the art of $k$-NN algorithms. In the short term, this overview allows users to choose the correct $k$-NN algorithm and parameters for their similarity search task; in the longer term, algorithm designers will be able to use this overview to test and refine automatic parameter tuning. The paper gives an overview of the system, evaluates the results of the benchmark, and points out directions for future work. Interestingly, very different approaches to $k$-NN search yield comparable quality-performance trade-offs. The system is available at http://ann-benchmarks.com .

Citations (368)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a comprehensive benchmarking tool that standardizes performance evaluation of ANN algorithms using metrics such as recall and query time.
  • It features automatic parameter tuning and a modular design, ensuring exhaustive and reproducible comparisons across varied datasets.
  • The study highlights trade-offs between methods, noting that graph-based techniques excel in high recall while tree-based approaches offer faster re-indexing.

A Benchmarking Tool for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Algorithms

The paper "ANN-Benchmarks: A Benchmarking Tool for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Algorithms" presents a comprehensive evaluation framework specifically designed to assess the performance of in-memory approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms. This effort provides a critical tool for both users aiming to select the most appropriate algorithm for their applications and researchers seeking to advance algorithmic development. In the field of high-dimensional data analysis, nearest neighbor search algorithms play a pivotal role in various applications, including image recognition and natural language processing.

Summary of Contributions

The presented framework offers a standardized method for evaluating ANN algorithms. It integrates numerous datasets and quality measures, and its modular design allows for straightforward inclusion of new algorithms and evaluation metrics. One of the system's key strengths is its automatic parameter tuning capability, which tests a variety of parameter settings for each algorithm, thus ensuring a fair and exhaustive comparison.

The ANN-Benchmarks framework provides a unified interface and includes plotting front-ends that facilitate visualization of results using LaTeX, images, and interactive websites. At its core, the system evaluates algorithms based on quality measures like recall and approximate recall, while providing detailed performance analytics including preprocessing and query times.

Numerical Performance and Algorithmic Insights

The evaluation performed through this benchmarking tool reveals compelling insights across a range of datasets and ANN solutions. Graph-based algorithms such as HNSW and KGraph consistently show superior performance for high recall values on typical benchmarks like GLOVE and SIFT datasets, which indicates their capability to maintain robustness across diverse metric spaces. However, these methods are marked by extended preprocessing times due to the construction of complex graph structures.

FAISS-Inverted File (IVF), a tree-based approach, emerges as a competent alternative offering modest preprocessing times and competitive query performance, especially in environments that necessitate rapid re-indexing. This aligns with observations that inverted index structures can effectively balance query efficiency with manageable index sizes.

Experimental Variability and Dataset Complexity

The detailed juxtaposition of ANN implementations highlights their varied adaptability to datasets with distinctive properties; for instance, the random dataset posited in this paper offers an intriguing case where most algorithms showcase similar performance, diverging markedly from the generally expected patterns for real-world data. This points towards gaps in understanding the nuanced relationships between dataset characteristics and algorithmic efficiency.

The ability of different algorithms to accommodate approximate solutions, particularly in high-dimensional contexts, also draws attention. Permitting slight variances from exact nearest neighbors leads to substantial improvements in query response times across many tested algorithms, providing a practically viable pathway for accelerating search tasks without substantial sacrifices in accuracy.

Future Directions

The current version of ANN-Benchmarks suggests numerous avenues for further exploration. Addressing automatic tuning and the integration of new distance metrics would enhance the framework's applicability and flexibility. Moreover, understanding dataset complexity through metrics-based frameworks could lead to better alignment between algorithm selection and dataset properties.

The prospect of facilitating batched queries and GPU-accelerated computations represents another promising direction, especially considering its success in significantly boosting query throughput, as evidenced by FAISS-GPU observations. These optimizations can unlock diverse real-time ANN applications, underscoring the utility of the framework in future algorithmic advancements.

Conclusion

ANN-Benchmarks stands as a pivotal contribution, driving forward the empirical evaluation of ANN algorithms. By ensuring rigorous, reproducible assessments, it lays the groundwork for both refining current methodologies and fostering breakthroughs in algorithmic research. The system's architecture and its rich suite of tools position it as an essential asset for the AI and data science communities, bridging the gap between theoretical innovation and practical deployment.