Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networks (1712.06541v5)

Published 18 Dec 2017 in cs.LG, cs.NE, and stat.ML

Abstract: We study the sample complexity of learning neural networks, by providing new bounds on their Rademacher complexity assuming norm constraints on the parameter matrix of each layer. Compared to previous work, these complexity bounds have improved dependence on the network depth, and under some additional assumptions, are fully independent of the network size (both depth and width). These results are derived using some novel techniques, which may be of independent interest.

Citations (524)

Summary

  • The paper presents new depth-independent Rademacher complexity bounds by controlling Schatten norms for enhanced generalization.
  • It converts exponential depth dependencies to polynomial ones, reducing error scaling from 2^d to sqrt(d) under Frobenius norm constraints.
  • The work emphasizes the necessity of using norm products across layers to mitigate network width effects and guides improved regularization strategies.

Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networks

The paper explores the sample complexity of neural networks by establishing new bounds on their Rademacher complexity under norm constraints on the parameter matrices of each layer. These bounds exhibit improved dependence on network depth and, under certain conditions, are independent of network size, including both depth and width.

Primary Contributions

  1. Depth-Independent Bounds: The authors present novel techniques that convert traditional depth-dependent complexity bounds into depth-independent ones. This involves controlling the Schatten norms of parameter matrices and approximating the neural network by composing a shallow network with univariate Lipschitz functions. This technique potentially offers size-independent generalization bounds, which is particularly relevant when the network's size exceeds the number of training examples.
  2. Rademacher Complexity Analysis: The authors improve on existing Rademacher complexity-based analyses by reducing exponential depth dependencies to polynomial ones. For instance, they demonstrate that for networks constrained by Frobenius norm, the generalization error can be improved from an exponential scale of 2^d to sqrt(d).
  3. Lower Bounds with Schatten Norms: The paper also presents lower bounds involving the control of Schatten norms. It shows that solely controlling spectral norms (or any Schatten norm with p\>2) cannot escape size dependencies related to the network width. This highlights the necessity of considering products of norms across layers for effective generalization bounds.

Implications and Speculations on Future Work

The implications are twofold:

  • Theoretical Insights: The independent size bounds contribute to a deeper understanding of neural networks' generalization capabilities. This suggests the potential to further explore norm-based constraints and their relaxation in capturing generalization properties.
  • Practical Applications: The findings could influence algorithms that rely on such bounds for regularization in neural networks, helping design more efficient models that generalize well even with massive architectures.

Future research could focus on softening the assumptions required for these bounds, such as reducing the strong constraints on norm products across layers. Exploring alternative norm constraints or developing new complexity measures less sensitive to network size could yield more nuanced insights.

Overall, this paper advances the discussion on how neural networks generalize in practice, offering a pathway toward understanding the intricate relationships between network structure, training data, and generalization errors.